Cited by 269Malaria Research and ControlMosquito-borne diseases and controlBird parasitology and diseases

SEVEN YEARS OF REGIONAL MALARIA CONTROL COLLABORATION—MOZAMBIQUE, SOUTH AFRICA, AND SWAZILAND

Open access
SHARP, BRIAN L., KLEINSCHMIDT, IMMO, STREAT, ELISABETH, MAHARAJ, RAJENDRA, BARNES, KAREN I., DURRHEIM, DAVID N., RIDL, FRANCES C., MORRIS, NATASHA +7 more·2007·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

The Lubombo Spatial Development Initiative is a joint development program between the governments of Mozambique, Swaziland, and South Africa, which includes malaria control as a core component of the initiative. Vector control through indoor residual spraying (IRS) was incrementally introduced in southern Mozambique between November 2000 and February 2004. Surveillance to monitor its impact was conducted by annual cross-sectional surveys to assess the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection, entomologic monitoring, and malaria case notification in neighboring South Africa and Swaziland. In southern Mozambique, there was a significant reduction in P. falciparum prevalence after the implementation of IRS, with an overall relative risk of 0.74 for each intervention year (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.66 after the first year to 0.93 after the fifth intervention year. Substantial reductions in notified malaria cases were reported in South Africa and Swaziland over the same period. The success of the program in reducing malaria transmission throughout the target area provides a strong argument for investment in regional malaria control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.2007.76.42

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective monitoring and decision support systems can enable insecticide resistance to be detected at an early stage, which should lead to the implementation of changes in insecticide policy.

    “Effective monitoring and decision support systems can enable insecticide resistance to be detected at an early stage, which should lead to the implementation of changes in insecticide policy (Sharp et al. 2007).”

    From Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease (2009) · cites this paper as Sharp et al. 2007

    The Interventions section reports that DDT was reintroduced in KwaZulu-Natal after pyrethroid resistance was detected, supporting the link between detecting resistance and changing insecticide use. It does not say that monitoring and decision-support systems detected the resistance early; the resistance described had already led to program failure. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DDT resistance developed relatively fast in An. stephensi, while its development in Anopheles funestus in South Africa where IRS with DDT started in 1946 was rather slow.

    “While DDT resistance developed relatively fast in some species, e.g., An. stephensi, its development in some other species, e.g., Anopheles funestus in South Africa where IRS with DDT started in 1946 was rather slow [98].”

    From Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Interventions section states that indoor residual spraying with DDT began in South Africa in 1946. It does not compare the speed of resistance development in An. stephensi and An. funestus; the resistance it describes in South Africa is to pyrethroids, not DDT. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In South Africa, in part of the malarious areas, DDT IRS is used for malaria vector control whereas in other states, different insecticides are being used.

    “In South Africa, in part of the malarious areas, DDT IRS is used for malaria vector control whereas in other states, different insecticides are being used [1, 98].”

    From Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Interventions section reports DDT indoor residual spraying in the South African provinces of Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal, alongside pyrethroid use in homes with painted walls and bendiocarb use in such homes in KwaZulu-Natal. It does not support the claimed geographic contrast that different insecticides were used in other South African states; the alternatives described were used in areas where DDT was also used. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In 1996, DDT was replaced with pyrethroid in South Africa, which had to be reversed due to the detection of monooxygenase-based pyrethroid insecticide resistance with no cross-resistance to DDT in An. funestus in KwaZulu-Natal Province in 2000.

    “In 1996, DDT was replaced with pyrethroid [99], which had to be reversed due to the detection of monooxygenase-based pyrethroid insecticide resistance with no cross-resistance to DDT in An. funestus in KwaZulu-Natal Province in 2000 [98].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sharp BL, Craig MH, Mnzava A, Curtis B, Maharaj R, Klein- schmidt I, 2001. Review of malaria in South Africa. Available at http://www.hst.org.za/uploads/files/chapter18_00.pdf. Ac- cessed October 19, 2006.
  2. Mabaso MLH, Sharp BL, le Sueur D, Lengeler C, 2004. Histori- cal review of malaria control in southern African with empha- sis on the use of indoor residual house spraying. Trop Med Int Health 9: 846-856.
  3. Ngxongo SM, 1993. The epidemiology of malaria in KwaZulu, 1980-1991. MSc thesis, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SHARP, B. L., KLEINSCHMIDT, I., STREAT, E., MAHARAJ, R., BARNES, K. I., DURRHEIM, D. N., RIDL, F. C., MORRIS, N., SEOCHARAN, I., KUNENE, S., LA GRANGE, J. J. P., MTHEMBU, J. D., MAARTENS, F., MARTIN, C. L., & BARRETO, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Malaria Research Programme, Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa; Maputo Province Directorate of Health, Lubombo Spatial Development Initiative Malaria Program, Matola, Maputo Province, Mozambique; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Hunter New England Population Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia; Malaria Control Programme...
Corresponding author
KLEINSCHMIDT, IMMO
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2007-01
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
42-47
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297845758
Cited by
269
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 26
FWCI
24.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • University of Cape Town
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
Keywords
malaria control, indoor residual spraying, Plasmodium falciparum, malaria prevalence, malaria case notification, regional cooperation, Mozambique, Swaziland, South Africa, malaria transmission reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Antimalarials, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Insect Vectors, International Cooperation, Mosquito Control, Mozambique, Plasmodium falciparum, South Africa, Eswatini, Time Factors, Prevalence, Malaria, Falciparum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review