Cited by 108Parasites and Host InteractionsHelminth infection and controlParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

LOW EFFICACY OF MEBENDAZOLE AGAINST HOOKWORM IN VIETNAM: TWO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Open access
FLOHR, CARSTEN, TUYEN, LUC NGUYEN, LEWIS, SARAH, MINH, TRUONG TAN, CAMPBELL, JIM, BRITTON, JOHN, WILLIAMS, HYWEL, HIEN, TRAN TINH +2 more·2007·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Vietnam is participating in a global de-worming effort that aims to treat 650 million school children regularly by 2010. The treatment used in Vietnam is single dose oral mebendazole (Phardazone®) 500 mg. We tested the efficacy of single dose mebendazole 500 mg in the therapy of hookworm infection in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial among 271 Vietnamese schoolchildren. The treatment efficacy of single dose mebendazole in children did not differ significantly from placebo, with a reduction in mean eggs per gram of feces relative to placebo of 31% (95% CI -9 to 56%, P = 0.1). In light of these findings we then carried out a similar randomized trial comparing triple dose mebendazole, single dose albendazole, and triple dose albendazole against placebo in 209 adults in the same area. The estimated reduction in mean post-treatment eggs per gram of feces relative to placebo was 63% (95% CI 30–81%) for triple mebendazole, 75% (47–88%) for single albendazole, and 88% (58–97%) for triple albendazole. Our results suggest that single dose oral mebendazole has low efficacy against hookworm infection in Vietnam, and that it should be replaced by albendazole. These findings are of major public health relevance given the opportunity costs of treating entire populations with ineffective therapies. We recommend that efficacy of anti-helminth therapies is pilot tested before implementation of national gut worm control programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.2007.76.732

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thereafter, low efficacies of mebendazole or albendazole against hookworms were repeatedly reported; for example, in Pemba Island, Zanzibar, Vietnam, and Ghana.

    “Thereafter, low efficacies of mebendazole or albendazole against hookworms were repeatedly reported; for example, in Pemba Island, Zanzibar [335,337], Vietnam [338], and Ghana [339].”
  • In Vietnam, a single (500 mg) or multiple doses of mebendazole (500 mg daily for 3 days) was found to have disappointing efficacy against hookworm infections in children (CR; 38% in mebendazole single dose group vs 33% in placebo group) and adults (CR; 26% in mebendazole 3-day group vs 35% in placebo group).

    “In Vietnam, a single (500 mg) or multiple doses of mebendazole (500 mg daily for 3 days) was found to have disappointing efficacy against hookworm infections in children (CR; 38% in mebendazole single dose group vs 33% in placebo group) and adults (CR; 26% in mebendazole 3-day group vs 35% in placebo group) [338].”
  • Drug resistance was also shown in albendazole in adults; CR was 45% in single dose albendazole (400 mg) group and 79% in albendazole 3-day group in comparison with 35% placebo group.

    “Drug resistance was also shown in albendazole in adults; CR was 45% in single dose albendazole (400 mg) group and 79% in albendazole 3-day group in comparison with 35% placebo group [338].”
  • These findings should provide some concern to the global health community, as the scale-up of mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths is now placing similar selection pressures for benzimidazole resistance in human hookworms and reduced efficacies are widely reported.

    “Consequently, these findings should provide some concern to the global health community, as the scale-up of mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is now placing similar selection pressures for benzimidazole resistance in human hookworms and reduced efficacies are widely reported [91–96].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 108

Authors
FLOHR, C., TUYEN, L. N., LEWIS, S., MINH, T. T., CAMPBELL, J., BRITTON, J., WILLIAMS, H., HIEN, T. T., FARRAR, J., & QUINNELL, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2007-04
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
732-736
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140628642
Cited by
108
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Asthma and Lung UK
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Leeds
  • University of Nottingham
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
hookworm infection, mebendazole, albendazole, anthelmintic efficacy, elementary school students, deworming programs, Vietnam
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Anthelmintics, Child, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hookworm Infections, Humans, Male, Mebendazole, Middle Aged, Vietnam, Albendazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review