Water condensate retention and “wet” fin performance in automotive evaporators
Abstract
Water condensate retained inside an automotive evaporator has remained as one of the primary sources of unpleasant “odors”, which in turn can drive up the warranty cost for automotive manufacturers. The “wet” evaporator fin can also underperform due to the presence of condensate blocking the air passage. Moreover, condensate retention can be a potential factor of freezing up evaporators. Thus, an evaporator fin must be designed such that it can shed and drain water condensate as well as provide an excellent heat transfer capability. While the importance of water retention is well known, there seems lacking of a comprehensive way to evaluate the water retention characteristics of a particular product. In this work, attempts were made to answer four questions: (1) What is the mechanism that controls water condensate retention characteristics in an automotive evaporator? (2) Can different water retention evaluation methods reveal the same characteristics? (3) How and to what extent can an evaporator fin underperform due to water retention? and (4) Can we design a “better” fin to alleviate the problem? Clearly, any conclusive solutions to these challenges can lead to an efficient and more compact evaporator design, which will then be the key of cutting cost while delivering superior product performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To calibrate and validate a model for water retention, dipping experiments are carried out using the method developed in Zhang et al. [43] and described by Westhaeuser et al. [42].
“To calibrate and validate a model for water retention, dipping experiments are carried out using the method developed in Zhang et al. [43] and described by Westhaeuser et al. [42].”
From Model for cyclic frosting and defrosting of flat tube heat exchangers: Theoretical analysis and experimental validation (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. [43]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 3 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Zhang, C. A., Hu, H., Jacobi, A. M., & Kaiser, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Visteon (United States) (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Jacobi, Anthony M.
- Venue
- SAE Technical Paper Series
- Publisher
- SAE International
- Published
- 2001-03-05
- Volume
- 1
- ISSN
- 0148-7191 (ISSN-L)
- 2688-3627
- OpenAlex
- W2264345603
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Keywords
- condensate drainage, odor control, heat transfer performance, air conditioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review