Cited by 31Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyTraffic and Road SafetyPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

On-Road Comparison of Driving Performance Measures When Using Handheld and Voice-Control Interfaces for Mobile Phones and Portable Music Players

Owens, Justin M., McLaughlin, Shane B., Sudweeks, Jeremy·2010·SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems

Abstract

This study presents an on-road evaluation of driver performance when controlling in-car technology via a handheld or voice-controlled interface. Participants drove with an experimenter on public roads while making mobile phone calls, having brief phone conversations, and playing tracks from a portable music player using both types of interface. The test vehicle was an instrumented 2010 Mercury Mariner equipped with the Ford SYNC® system, which allows for voice control of mobile phones and portable music devices. Twenty-one participants were tested, including 12 younger (19-34) and 9 older (39-51). All participants were owners of a vehicle equipped with the voice-control system, and all used the system regularly for phone calls and music playback. Results indicated that handheld dialing and music track selection tasks were of longer duration and were associated with more frequent and longer glances to the interior of the vehicle, more total glance time to the interior of the vehicle, higher steering variance and maximum steering wheel velocity, and higher subjective mental demand than when using voice control for the same tasks. These differences were not found for conversation tasks. All tasks had higher mental demand than baseline driving. Further, older drivers had more difficulty maintaining vehicle tracking when dialing and playing tracks using handheld controls, as seen in steering variance and maximum steering velocity data. These findings suggest that voice control of in-vehicle devices may allow drivers to keep their eyes on the road longer, track their course more consistently, and have lower mental demand than when these devices are controlled manually.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4271/2010-01-1036

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Owens, J. M., McLaughlin, S. B., & Sudweeks, J.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Published
2010-04-12
Volume
03
Issue
1
Pages
734-743
ISSN
  • 1946-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-4002
OpenAlex
W2133170654
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ford Motor Company
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
voice control, mobile devices, portable music players, driving performance, driver distraction, on-road driving, speech recognition, infotainment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review