On-Road Comparison of Driving Performance Measures When Using Handheld and Voice-Control Interfaces for Mobile Phones and Portable Music Players
Abstract
This study presents an on-road evaluation of driver performance when controlling in-car technology via a handheld or voice-controlled interface. Participants drove with an experimenter on public roads while making mobile phone calls, having brief phone conversations, and playing tracks from a portable music player using both types of interface. The test vehicle was an instrumented 2010 Mercury Mariner equipped with the Ford SYNC® system, which allows for voice control of mobile phones and portable music devices. Twenty-one participants were tested, including 12 younger (19-34) and 9 older (39-51). All participants were owners of a vehicle equipped with the voice-control system, and all used the system regularly for phone calls and music playback. Results indicated that handheld dialing and music track selection tasks were of longer duration and were associated with more frequent and longer glances to the interior of the vehicle, more total glance time to the interior of the vehicle, higher steering variance and maximum steering wheel velocity, and higher subjective mental demand than when using voice control for the same tasks. These differences were not found for conversation tasks. All tasks had higher mental demand than baseline driving. Further, older drivers had more difficulty maintaining vehicle tracking when dialing and playing tracks using handheld controls, as seen in steering variance and maximum steering velocity data. These findings suggest that voice control of in-vehicle devices may allow drivers to keep their eyes on the road longer, track their course more consistently, and have lower mental demand than when these devices are controlled manually.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ASR can be used in smart input system [163], automatic transcription system, smart voice assistant [164], [165], computer-assisted speech rehabilitation and language teaching [166].
“For example, ASR can be used in the smart input system [163], automatic transcription system, smart voice assistant [164], [165], computer-assisted speech rehabilitation and language teaching [166].”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [164]
Voice control allows drivers to keep watching out-car environment and demands lower mental load, whereas handheld controls may distract driver's attention and require higher mental demand, probably leading to dangerous driving behaviors.
“The study in [164] shows that voice control allows drivers to keep watching out-car environment and demands lower mental load. By contrast, handheld controls may distract driver's attention and require higher mental demand, probably leading to dangerous driving behaviors.”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [164]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.
Drews, F. A., Pasupathi, M., & Strayer, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0013119 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, J., & Tao, D. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3039359 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
- Authors
- Owens, J. M., McLaughlin, S. B., & Sudweeks, J.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Venue
- SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
- Publisher
- SAE International
- Published
- 2010-04-12
- Volume
- 03
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 734-743
- ISSN
- 1946-3995 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-4002
- OpenAlex
- W2133170654
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ford Motor Company
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Keywords
- voice control, mobile devices, portable music players, driving performance, driver distraction, on-road driving, speech recognition, infotainment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review