Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heavy-Duty RCCI Operation Using Natural Gas and Diesel

Nieman, Derek E., Dempsey, Adam B., Reitz, Rolf D.·2012·SAE International Journal of Engines

Abstract

Many recent studies have shown that the Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) combustion strategy can achieve high efficiency with low emissions. However, it has also been revealed that RCCI combustion is difficult at high loads due to its premixed nature. To operate at moderate to high loads with gasoline/diesel dual fuel, high amounts of EGR or an ultra low compression ratio have shown to be required. Considering that both of these approaches inherently lower thermodynamic efficiency, in this study natural gas was utilized as a replacement for gasoline as the low-reactivity fuel. Due to the lower reactivity (i.e., higher octane number) of natural gas compared to gasoline, it was hypothesized to be a better fuel for RCCI combustion, in which a large reactivity gradient between the two fuels is beneficial in controlling the maximum pressure rise rate.The multi-dimensional CFD code, KIVA3V, was used in conjunction with the CHEMKIN chemistry tool and a Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) to perform optimization for a wide range of engine operating conditions. Engine design parameters that were controlled by the genetic algorithm include the fraction of total fuel that is premixed (methane), the timing of the two diesel injections, the amount of diesel in each injection, the diesel fuel injection pressure, and the EGR percentage. The objective of the optimization was to simultaneously minimize soot, NOx, CO, and UHC emissions, as well as ISFC and ringing intensity. A broad load/speed range was investigated; six operating points from 4 to 23 bar IMEP and 800 to 1800 rev/min were optimized. These load/speed combinations represent typical heavy-duty engine conditions. Using the stock compression ratio of 16.1, it was determined that operation up to 13.5 bar IMEP could be achieved with no EGR, while still maintaining high efficiency and low emissions. The study also examined the sensitivity of RCCI combustion at high load to injection system parameters. The results emphasize that precise injection control is needed for combustion control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4271/2012-01-0379

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Nieman, D. E., Dempsey, A. B., & Reitz, R. D.
Venue
SAE International Journal of Engines
Published
2012-04-16
Volume
05
Issue
2
Pages
270-285
ISSN
  • 1946-3936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-3944
OpenAlex
W2047972770
Cited by
308
References
1
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heavy-Duty RCCI Operation Using Natural Gas and Diesel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4271/2012-01-0379
The paper
Nieman, D. E., Dempsey, A. B., & Reitz, R. D. (2012). Heavy-Duty RCCI Operation Using Natural Gas and Diesel. SAE International Journal of Engines. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0379

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.