Biojet Fuel - A Tool for a Sustainable Aviation Industry - A Technical Assessment
Abstract
The aviation industry currently holds a share of 2% global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although relatively small, estimated demand increase indicates an up to 350% emission rise in 2050, in the so called “no action scenario”. These emissions are injected into the upper atmosphere, with a potentialized stronger greenhouse effect than at ground level. In this context, ambitious emission reduction targets have been proposed into a global commitment, focused into a long term carbon emission reduction strategy, which would lead to net GHG emissions to peak in 2020, and then halves by 2050, based on 2005 levels, while accommodating increased air transport demand. To achieve this challenging goal, a multifaceted approach is required, ranging from technology oriented actions, like revolutionary aerodynamically driven design, new composite lightweight material and engine technology improvement, as well as improved ground and flight operational practices. However, such an ambitious target cannot be achieved solely by technology and operational improvements within the aviation industry alone. In this context, the so called Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF), most particularly biofuels (biojet fuels), have been identified as having the potential to make a significant contribution to a carbon emission reduction pathway in the aviation industry, as they allow a 50 to 80 percent GHG reduction into a lifecycle basis, compared to fossil fuel emissions, as well as a reduction in sulfur, soot and particulate emissions. Biojet fuel, the generic term that describes biofuel for jet engines, made from renewable, biologically derived material, is basically a liquid fuel produced through chemical processes/conversion pathways, with the same or better performance properties available on conventional jet fuel (petroleum based). They may be used in the so called drop-in fuel concept, which allows compatibility with existing engines, aircraft, fuel storage and distribution system, as well as be blended with existing tradition (petroleum based) jet fuel in increasing quantities (currently up to 50%). From a technical perspective, biojet fuels perform as well as or better than traditional petroleum based jet fuel. Nevertheless, current availability of aviation biofuels is limited and their costs are still higher than petroleum based jet fuels, basically due to production processes’ technology immaturity and small scale production. However, there are currently ongoing efforts from the aviation industry focused on identifying sustainable and economically feasible biologically derived feedstocks, conversion process and supply chains, to make biojet fuel competitive with fossil based jet fuel in the medium term. Moreover, as crude oil supply and pricing become less predictable, conventional jet fuel prices will trend upward. This work is supposed to present an overview of the current state of the art of biojet fuel technical knowledge (from feedstock, conversion methods to in use performance analysis), associated with an economic assessment, followed by some illustrative case studies, into a unique document, to make available to the reader the current most relevant available biojet fuel technology knowledge into a review format.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given the low-cost of most waste biomass, BAF developers have been rapidly considering these as feedstock.
“Given the low-cost of most waste biomass, BAF developers have been rapidly considering these as feedstock (Mawhood et al. 2016, Barbosa 2017, Wenger and Stern 2019).”
From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Barbosa 2017
Cites
Life Cycle Assessment of Potential Biojet Fuel Production in the United States
Agusdinata, D. B., Zhao, F., Ileleji, K., & DeLaurentis, D. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202148g · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components
Doliente, S. S., Narayan, A., Tapia, J. F. D., Samsatli, N. J., Zhao, Y., & Samsatli, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00110 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barbosa, F. C.
- Affiliations
- FCB Research and Consulting
- Corresponding author
- Barbosa, Fábio Coelho
- Venue
- SAE Technical Paper Series
- Publisher
- SAE International
- Published
- 2017-11-07
- Volume
- 1
- ISSN
- 0148-7191 (ISSN-L)
- 2688-3627
- OpenAlex
- W2783204351
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
- Keywords
- biojet fuel, sustainable aviation fuel, biofuels, aviation greenhouse gas emissions, carbon reduction targets, drop-in fuels, biofuel blending, biofuel feedstock, biofuel supply chain, biofuel production costs, aviation decarbonization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review