The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays
Abstract
The maximum axial penetration distance of liquid phase fuel (i.e., the “liquid length”) in an evaporating diesel spray was investigated over a wide range of conditions using Mie-scattered light imaging. The parameters varied in the investigation included: the injection pressure, the orifice diameter and aspect ratio, the ambient gas temperature and density, and the fuel volatility and temperature. The experiments were conducted in a constant-volume combustion vessel with extensive optical access. Fuels were injected with an electronically controlled, common-rail diesel fuel injector. The dominant trends observed were: (a) Liquid length decreases linearly with orifice diameter and approaches zero as the orifice diameter approaches zero. (b) Injection pressure has no significant effect on liquid length. (c) Liquid length decreases with increasing ambient gas density or temperature, but with a declining sensitivity to each one as they increase. (d) Decreasing fuel volatility or fuel temperature increases liquid length. (e) Finally, the liquid length of a multi-component fuel is controlled by its lower volatility fractions. Two major conclusions were drawn from the observed trends. First, vaporization in a diesel spray, like diesel combustion after the premixed burn, is controlled by air entrainment into the spray (i.e., by turbulent mixing). Atomization and local interphase transport processes, such as droplet evaporation, do not limit the rate of vaporization. Second, evaporation in a diesel spray occurs to a large extent through a batch distillation-type process with higher volatility components evaporating first and lower volatility components controlling the liquid length.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles
Bohren, C. F., & Huffman, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1002/9783527618156 · Cited by 18,474
Light Scattering by Small Particles
Van de Hulst, H. C., & Twersky, V. (1957) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3060205 · Cited by 5,619
Lefebvre, A. H., & McDonell, V. G. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315120911 · Cited by 2,444
Evaporation and combustion of sprays
Faeth, G. M. (1983) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/0360-1285(83)90005-9 · Cited by 737
Thermodynamic properties in SI
Reynolds, W. C. (1979) · Cited by 482
Cited by
Mohan, B., Yang, W., & Chou, S. K. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.051 · Cited by 306
Modeling the outcome of drop–drop collisions in Diesel sprays
Post, S. L., & Abraham, J. (2002) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/s0301-9322(02)00007-1 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Siebers, D. L.
- Venue
- SAE Technical Paper Series
- Publisher
- SAE International
- Published
- 1998-02-23
- Volume
- 1
- ISSN
- 0148-7191 (ISSN-L)
- 2688-3627
- OpenAlex
- W1498752074
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.