The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of a Collision Avoidance System
Abstract
The analysis of a rear-end collision warning/avoidance (CW/CA) system algorithm will be presented. The system is designed to meet several criteria: 1.System warnings should result in a minimum load on driver attention. 2.Automatic control of the brakes should not interfere with normal driving operation. 3.The system should perform well in a variety of driving conditions. The resulting CA algorithm will use a tire-road friction estimate. The benefit of combining a tire-road friction estimator with a CA system will be studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control
Vahidi, A., & Eskandarian, A. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2003.821292 · Cited by 836
Effect of Warning Timing on Collision Avoidance Behavior in a Stationary Lead Vehicle Scenario
McGehee, D. V., Brown, T. L., Lee, J. D., & Wilson, T. B. (2002) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1803-01 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Seiler, P., Song, B., & Hedrick, J. K.
- Venue
- SAE Technical Paper Series
- Publisher
- SAE International
- Published
- 1998-02-23
- Volume
- 1
- ISSN
- 0148-7191 (ISSN-L)
- 2688-3627
- OpenAlex
- W1528532260
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Collision Avoidance System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4271/980853
- The paper
- Seiler, P., Song, B., & Hedrick, J. K. (1998). Development of a Collision Avoidance System. SAE Technical Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.4271/980853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
