An Occupational Perspective of the Recovery Journey in Mental Health
Abstract
Background: The philosophy of occupational therapy and that of recovery are markedly similar; however, there is limited research linking occupation to recovery in mental health. Aim: This study aimed to explore the relationship between recovery and occupation in consumers with mental health problems. Method: A qualitative method in the form of narratives was chosen in exploring the uniquely subjective experiences of mental health, occupation and recovery. Five members of a mental health support group (GROW) were engaged in semi-structured interviews, whereby individual narratives were analysed through comparative methods to identify categories and themes. Findings: Five categories emerged: (1) The recovery map, (2) GROW has just given me the platform, (3) You have to become active, (4) The great barriers and (5) Where am I now … I couldn't bear it if I was any better. The participants' experiences of recovery highlighted the necessity for occupational engagement in a supported environment. The benefits of occupation included feelings of social cohesion, meaning, purpose, normalisation, routine, competence, productivity, skill acquisition, routine and pleasure. These factors enabled the participants to re-establish self-concepts and subsequently promoted mental health. Implications: The findings may have implications for occupational therapy practice, whereby occupational therapy could facilitate a leadership role in recovery-orientated mental health services.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that increased recovery co-varied with increased engagement in activity is in agreement with both qualitative and quantitative research, suggesting a well-established connection between these phenomena.
“The finding that increased recovery co-varied with increased engagement in activity is in agreement with both qualitative [2, 19, 43] and quantitative [20] research, suggesting a well-established connection between these phenomena.”
From Exploring mediators of the recovery process over time among mental health service users, using a mixed model regression analysis based on cluster RCT data (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Kelly, M., Lamont, S., & Brunero, S.
- Affiliations
- Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lamont, Scott
- Venue
- British Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 129-135
- ISSN
- 0308-0226 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-6006
- OpenAlex
- W1976884611
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Keywords
- mental health recovery, occupation, mental health service users, occupational engagement, recovery-oriented mental health services, social cohesion, meaning and purpose, self-concept, barriers to recovery, mental health support groups, occupational therapy practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review