Engagement in activities and occupations by people who have experienced psychosis: A metasynthesis of lived experience
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to answer the question ‘How do people who have experienced psychosis describe their engagement in activities of daily living and occupations?’ Procedures: A qualitative metasynthesis was undertaken on nine studies (encompassing 73 participants) published in occupational therapy literature. Only studies that had used individual qualitative interviews were included to highlight lived experience on a personal level. The quality of the evidence was assessed across all studies and found to be generally high. Findings: Four overarching themes across the nine studies were identified: my emotions and identity; my own health and wellbeing; my relationships with family, friends and community; and my activities and occupations. The overarching themes are not intended to be considered categorically, as they all influence and interact with each other. Conclusion and relevance: There is considerable synchronicity between the experiences of people who have experienced psychosis and the values of the profession. A client's meaningful engagement in activities and occupation is evidence towards how therapists provide authentic, respectful and effective support to these clients, in a manner that meets their needs as individuals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The potential of engagement in self-chosen activities to support personal recovery lies in their capacity to create conditions for building hope, meaning and purpose in life, developing social connections in communities of choice and ways of self-managing one's health in everyday life.
“The potential of engagement in self-chosen activities to support personal recovery lies in their capacity to create conditions for building hope, meaning and purpose in life, developing social connections in communities of choice and ways of self-managing one’s health in everyday life (27–29).”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Hitch, D., Pepin, G., & Stagnitti, K.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Senior Lecturer, Occupational Science and Therapy Programme, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Venue
- British Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 77-86
- ISSN
- 0308-0226 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-6006
- OpenAlex
- W2020106305
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Keywords
- psychosis, lived experience, activities of daily living, occupation, meaningful engagement, health and well-being, interpersonal relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review