Cited by 23Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Coaching Residents in the Ambulatory Setting: Faculty Direct Observation and Resident Reflection

Open access
Graddy, Ryan, Reynolds, Stasia S., Wright, Scott M.·2018·Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Abstract

Background: Direct observation can be valuable for learners' skill development in graduate medical education, but it is done infrequently. Information on how to optimize trainee learning from, and best practices of, direct observation interventions in the ambulatory setting is limited. Objective: We explored the impact of a focused outpatient direct observation and coaching intervention on internal medicine residents. Methods: Using a behavior checklist based on tenets of clinical excellence, 2 faculty preceptors observed outpatient primary care visits with 96% (46 of 48) of the internal medicine residents in 2017. Residents self-assessed their performance after the visit using the same checklist. Next, a focused coaching feedback session, emphasizing reflection, was structured to highlight areas of discrepancy between resident self-assessment and coach observation (blind spots), and residents were asked to identify goals for practice improvement. Results: Common blind spots in resident self-assessment related to collaborating with patients while using the electronic health record (48%, 21 of 44), hand washing (43%, 20 of 46), and asking thoughtful questions (40%, 18 of 45). At 1-month follow-up, 93% (43 of 46) of responding residents reported change in practice toward goals often or sometimes. All residents reported that the intervention felt comfortable, and 98% (45 of 46) noted that it helped them identify new behaviors to incorporate into clinical practice. Conclusions: Structured episodes of direct observation and coaching in the outpatient setting, with a behavior checklist, appear acceptable and useful for internal medicine residents' learning and development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4300/jgme-17-00788.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 23

Authors
Graddy, R., Reynolds, S. S., & Wright, S. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Graddy, Ryan
Venue
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Published
2018-08-01
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
449-454
ISSN
  • 1949-8349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-8357
OpenAlex
W2883650964
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Center for Innovative Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
direct observation, coaching, internal medicine residents, outpatient care, outpatient primary care, resident self-assessment, behavior checklist, clinical excellence, reflective practice, hand hygiene, clinical skills development
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Ambulatory Care, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Faculty, Medical, Feedback, Female, Goals, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Male, Mental Processes, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Primary Health Care, Self-Assessment, Problem-Based Learning, Observation, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review