The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advancing Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education
Open accessAbstract
Background: The Outcome Project requires high-quality assessment approaches to provide reliable and valid judgments of the attainment of competencies deemed important for physician practice. Intervention: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) convened the Advisory Committee on Educational Outcome Assessment in 2007–2008 to identify high-quality assessment methods. The assessments selected by this body would form a core set that could be used by all programs in a specialty to assess resident performance and enable initial steps toward establishing national specialty databases of program performance. The committee identified a small set of methods for provisional use and further evaluation. It also developed frameworks and processes to support the ongoing evaluation of methods and the longer-term enhancement of assessment in graduate medical education. Outcome: The committee constructed a set of standards, a methodology for applying the standards, and grading rules for their review of assessment method quality. It developed a simple report card for displaying grades on each standard and an overall grade for each method reviewed. It also described an assessment system of factors that influence assessment quality. The committee proposed a coordinated, national-level infrastructure to support enhancements to assessment, including method development and assessor training. It recommended the establishment of a new assessment review group to continue its work of evaluating assessment methods. The committee delivered a report summarizing its activities and 5 related recommendations for implementation to the ACGME Board in September 2008.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes
Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Schuwirth, L. W. T. (2005) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x · Cited by 1,268
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2003) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeg112 · Cited by 958
Veloski, J., Boex, J. R., Grasberger, M. J., Evans, A., & Wolfson, D. B. (2006) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590600622665 · Cited by 500
The SEGUE Framework for teaching and assessing communication skills
Makoul, G. (2001) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00136-7 · Cited by 457
Cited by
The Next GME Accreditation System — Rationale and Benefits
Nasca, T. J., Philibert, I., Brigham, T., & Flynn, T. C. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr1200117 · Cited by 1,611
Faculty Development in Assessment: The Missing Link in Competency-Based Medical Education
Holmboe, E. S., Ward, D. S., Reznick, R. K., Katsufrakis, P. J., Leslie, K. M., Patel, V. L., Ray, D. D., & Nelson, E. A. (2011) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31820cb2a7 · Cited by 324
Self-citationCoaching Non-technical Skills Improves Surgical Residents’ Performance in a Simulated Operating Room
Yule, S., Parker, S. H., Wilkinson, J., McKinley, A., MacDonald, J., Neill, A., & McAdam, T. (2015) · Journal of Surgical Education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.06.012 · Cited by 152
Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Rosenfeld, J., Trinh, K., Wood, T. J., & Norman, G. R. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.36914 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Swing, S. R., Clyman, S. G., Holmboe, E. S., & Williams, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Graduate Medical Education
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-286
- ISSN
- 1949-8349 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-8357
- OpenAlex
- W2028723965
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advancing Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4300/jgme-d-09-00010.1
- The paper
- Swing, S. R., Clyman, S. G., Holmboe, E. S., & Williams, R. G. (2009). Advancing Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-09-00010.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.