Internal Medicine Residents' Computer Use in the Inpatient Setting
Open accessAbstract
Background Studies have suggested that patient contact time for internal medicine residents is decreasing and being replaced with computer-related activities, yet objective data regarding computer use by residents are lacking. Objective The aim of this study was to objectively measure time use by internal medicine residents while on duty in the hospital setting using real-time, voice-capture technology. Methods First- and third-year categoric internal medicine residents participated (n = 25) during a 3-month period in 2010 while rotating on general internal medicine rotations. Portable speech-recognition technology was used to record residents' activities. The residents were prompted every 15 minutes from an earpiece and asked to categorize the activity they had been doing since the last prompt, choosing from a predetermined list of 15 activities. Results Of the 1008 duty-time responses, 493 (49%) were classified as computer-related activities, whereas 341 (34%) were classified as direct patient care, 110 (11%) were classified as noncomputer-related education, and 64 (6%) were classified as other activities. Of resident reported computer-use time, 70% was spent on patient notes and order entry. Conclusions The results of our study suggest that computer use is the predominant activity for internal medicine residents while in the inpatient setting. Work redesign because of duty hour regulations should consider how to free up residents' time from computer-based activities to all…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Providers typically spend over 50% of their time using the EHR.
“since providers typically spend over 50% of their time using the EHR”
From Electronic health record activity changes around new decision support implementation: monitoring using audit logs and topic modeling (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Oxentenko, A. S., Manohar, C. U., McCoy, C. P., Bighorse, W. K., McDonald, F. S., Kolars, J. C., & Levine, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Graduate Medical Education
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 529-532
- ISSN
- 1949-8349 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-8357
- PMC
- PMC3546587
- OpenAlex
- W2077414095
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Graduate Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK050456, R01DK063226, R01DK066270, R01DK056650)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000585)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- internal medicine residents, computer use, direct patient care, electronic health records, order entry, clinical notes, duty hour regulations, job redesign
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review