Cited by 23Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The Use of COMLEX-USA and USMLE for Residency Applicant Selection

Open access
Sandella, Jeanne M., Gimpel, John R., Smith, Larissa L., Boulet, John R.·2016·Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Abstract

The Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) and the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) are recognized by all state medical licensing boards in the United States, and the Federation of State Medical Boards has supported the validity of both examinations for medical licensure. Many osteopathic medical students take both examinations.Background The purpose of this study was to investigate performance on COMLEX-USA Level 1 and USMLE Step 1 of students from colleges of osteopathic medicine where the majority of students took both examinations.Objective Data were collected on the entering classes of 2010 and 2011. Relationships between the COMLEX-USA Level 1 and the USMLE Step 1 were quantified using Pearson correlations. The correlation between outcomes on the 2 examinations was evaluated using the phi coefficient. A contingency table was constructed to look at first-attempt outcomes (pass/fail).Methods Data for 2010 and 2011 were collected from 3 osteopathic medical schools, with 795 of 914 students (87%) taking both examinations. The correlation between first-attempt COMLEX-USA Level 1 and USMLE Step 1 scores was statistically significant across and within all 3 schools. The overall correlation was r(795) = 0.84 (P < .001). Pass/fail status on the 2 examinations was moderately correlated (ϕ = 0.39, P < .01).Results Our study found a strong association between COMLEX Level 1 and USMLE Step 1 performance. Additional studies to accurately compare scores on these examinations are warranted.Conclusions

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4300/jgme-d-15-00246.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Licciardone, 2009, Clinical practice characteristics of osteopathic and allopathic primary care physicians at academic health centers: results from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, Acad Med, 84, 744, 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a424fc · DOI
  2. Boulet, 2003, Using National Medical Care Survey data to validate examination content on a performance-based clinical skills assessment for osteopathic physicians, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 103, 225
  3. Lee, 2014, Reliability and validity of conversion formulas between comprehensive osteopathic medical licensing examination of the United States level 1 and United States medical licensing examination step 1, J Grad Med Educ, 6, 280, 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00302.1 · DOI
  4. Slocum, 2006, How to predict USMLE scores from COMLEX-USA scores: a guide for directors of ACGME-accredited residency programs, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 106, 568
  5. Chick, 2010, Relationship between COMLEX and USMLE scores among osteopathic medical students who take both examinations, Teach Learn Med, 22, 3, 10.1080/10401330903445422 · DOI
  6. Sarko, 2010, COMLEX-1 and USMLE-1 are not interchangeable examinations, Acad Emerg Med, 17, 218, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00632.x · DOI
  7. Evans, 2007, Does the medical college admission test predict global academic performance in osteopathic medical school?, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 107, 157
  8. Sefcik, 2003, Characteristics of the courses that best predict COMLEX-USA level 1 performance, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 103, 491
  9. Baker, 2006, Relationships between scores on the COMLEX-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation and selected school-based performance measures, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 106, 290
  10. Baker, 2000, Relationship of preadmission variables and first- and second-year course performance to performance on the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners' COMLEX-USA Level 1 examination, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 100, 153
  11. Meoli, 2002, Relationship of osteopathic medical licensure examinations with undergraduate admission measures and predictive value of identifying future performance in osteopathic principles and practice/osteopathic manipulative medicine courses and rotations, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 102, 615
  12. Dixon, 2004, Relation between variables of preadmission, medical school performance, and COMLEX-USA levels 1 and 2 performance, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 104, 332
  13. Dixon, 2012, Prediction of osteopathic medical school performance on the basis of MCAT score, GPA, sex, undergraduate major, and undergraduate institution, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 112, 175
  14. Evans, 2003, Relationship between academic achievement and student performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA level 2, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 103, 331
  15. Hartman, 2001, Correlation of scores for the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination with osteopathic medical school grades, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 101, 347
  16. Baker, 2000, Relationship between academic achievement and COMLEX-USA Level 1 performance: a multisite study, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 100, 238
  17. Langenau, 2011, Relationships between high-stakes clinical skills exam scores and program director global competency ratings of first-year pediatric residents, Med Educ Online, 16, 7362, 10.3402/meo.v16i0.7362 · DOI
  18. Sevensma, 2008, and in-service examination scores: tools for evaluating medical knowledge among residents, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 108, 713
  19. Li, 2014, Relationship between COMLEX-USA scores and performance on the American Osteopathic Board of Emergency Medicine Part I certifying examination, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 114, 260, 10.7556/jaoa.2014.051 · DOI
  20. Cavalieri, 2003, Predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written examinations, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 103, 337
  21. Prober, 2016, A plea to reassess the role of united states medical licensing examination step 1 scores in residency selection, Acad Med, 91, 12, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000855 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sandella, J. M., Gimpel, J. R., Smith, L. L., & Boulet, J. R.
Affiliations
National Board of Medical Examiners (US)
Corresponding author
Sandella, Jeanne M.
Venue
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
358-363
ISSN
  • 1949-8349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-8357
OpenAlex
W2346491982
Cited by
23
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
USMLE Step 1, osteopathic medical students, medical licensing examinations, residency selection, osteopathic medical schools
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Licensure, Medical, Male, Osteopathic Medicine, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review