Evaluation Research on the Quality of the Railway Passenger Service Based on the Linguistic Variables and the Improved PROMETHEE-II Method
Abstract
The evaluation of quality of the railway passenger service is an important way to know the quality of the railway passenger service. This paper firstly constructs an evaluation indicator system of the quality of the railway passenger service on the foundation of the related literatures, and constructs the multiple-attribute evaluation matrix and indicator weight vector based on the linguistic variables. Then the linguistic variables are transformed to triangular fuzzy numbers, and the priority relation based on the evaluation of the “common rule” is constructed using the improved PROMETHEE-II method. Then the fuzzy positive flux, fuzzy negative flux and fuzzy net flux are calculated. According to the triangular fuzzy number expected value of the net flux, the order of the projects is confirmed. Finally, the evaluation model is used to the evaluation of passenger service quality of three railway station of Ji’nan railway Administration. The application instance shows that this method is easy to use and can be used widely.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of integrated testing tools to secure DevOps is a DevOps security challenge.
“We reviewed those studies briefly and extracted all the challenging factors including lack of secure coding standards [2], [23], [80], [81], using unsuitable performance metrics for security evaluation [2], [69], [78], [79] and lack of integrated testing tools to secure DevOps [14], [52], [53], [71].”
From Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Liu, P., & Guan, Z.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
- ORCID
- Guan, Zhongliang
- Venue
- Journal of Computers
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1796-203X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144873532
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- service quality evaluation, linguistic variables, triangular fuzzy numbers, multi-attribute decision making, evaluation index system, railway stations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
