The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Security Evaluation Method Based on Threat Classification for Web Service
Abstract
Web service is a distributed computing model constructed on the basis of open standard technology with the characteristics of loose coupling, language neutrality, platform-independence, etc., how to efficiently evaluate the security of Web service is a challenging research topic. Current researches concern more about the testing of Web service and rarely about the issue of service security evaluation. On the basis of analyzing the current Web services in terms of security threats, a Web service security evaluation method based on threat classification is proposed, which can process security evaluation to Web service from different angles of view, such as spoofing, tampering, repudiation, message disclosure, denial of service and elevation of privilege, and can provide a referential evaluation index of Web service security for the users through the threat modeling and evaluating the degree of security. Finally, a case study on SOA application is discussed in detail, experimental results show that the proposed model works efficiently, it can provide valuable reference to check out security vulnerabilities of Web service and help to optimize the system’s security design.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Proper implementation of HSTS (standardized in 2012 [8]) eliminates the vulnerability associated with unsecured HTTP connections, ensuring encryption of sensitive information during transfer.”
From HTTP Security Headers Analysis of Several Macedonian Website Categories (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Lei, 2007, Research on the Reliability Testing of Web Services Based on Fault Injection Technology, Mini-Micro Systems, 28, 127
- Howard, 2002, David Leblanc.Writing Secure Code
- Rui, 2008, Requirement Model-Based Mutation Testing For Web Service, 71
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HTTP Security Headers Analysis of Several Macedonian Website Categories
Mileva, A., Bikov, D., Tasheva, B., & Brashnarova, A. (2025) · Computer Science Journal of Moldova · doi:10.56415/csjm.v33.01
Securing the Web: Analysis of HTTP Security Headers in Popular Global Websites
Kishnani, U., & Das, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14924
“Effective website security evaluation tools should ensure compatibility, crawla-bility, vulnerability testing, detailed reporting, and usability with up-to-date databases and flexible interfaces (GUI or CLI)[79,47].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, L., Chen, H., Deng, F., & Zhong, Q.
- Venue
- Journal of Software
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1796-217X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089646592
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Software (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
- Keywords
- web service security, security analysis, threat classification, threat modeling, security vulnerabilities, spoofing attacks, tampering, repudiation, denial-of-service attacks, service-oriented architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review