The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings
Open accessAbstract
Introducción: La formación direccionada a los procesos comunicativos permite optimizar los flujos informacionales que se desarrollan en el contexto de la educación superior.Objetivo: El objetivo del artículo es exponer el diseño de un modelo permanente de formación que se centre en fortalecer el flujo comunicacional en docentes y estudiantes de administración de empresas en universidades públicas del caribe colombiano.Metodología: La investigación se desarrolla bajo el paradigma positivista, tipificada como proyectiva cuyo diseño es no experimental, transeccional, de campo.La muestra está conformada por 27 docentes y 82 estudiantes del referido programa académico.Los datos fueron recolectados mediante encuestas, utilizándose un cuestionario de 36 ítems.El análisis de los datos se hace a través de la estadística inferencial, mediante el cálculo de ANOVA de un Factor.Resultado s y discusión: los procesos de formación permanente centrados en fortalecer el flujo comunicacional son insuficientes por cuanto deben fortalecerse las estrategias que conlleven a un intercambio efectivo de información y conocimiento entre los diferentes actores e instancias universitarias.Conclusiones: Es importante que los docentes y estudiantes consoliden su compromiso con los procesos encaminados a la participación universitaria, generando estrategias de emprendimiento en su formación permanente e incrementando la apropiación de los procesos de comunicación hacia el interior de la organización.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Cited by 24,217
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18,397
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1990) · Cited by 14,529
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Flick, U. (2023) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036231712 · Cited by 8,198
Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Wilson, R. D., & Creswell, J. W. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152153 · Cited by 7,080
Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315833835 · Cited by 3,470
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Croker, R. A. (2009) · Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1057/9780230239517_1 · Cited by 2,316
Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052001031 · Cited by 1,740
Research Methods in Language Learning
Fang, Z., & Nunan, D. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587215 · Cited by 1,351
Cited by
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND RELATED SUBJECTS
MOHAJAN, H. K. (2018) · Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People · doi:10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571 · Cited by 1,478
Mayombe, C. (2024) · Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning · doi:10.1108/heswbl-10-2022-0216 · Cited by 24
Watson, D. P., Ahonen, E. Q., Shuman, V., Brown, M., Tsemberis, S., Huynh, P., Ouyang, F., & Xu, H. (2018) · Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy · doi:10.1186/s13011-018-0172-3 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Zohrabi, M.
- Venue
- Theory and Practice in Language Studies
- Publisher
- Academy Publication
- Published
- 2013-02-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1799-2591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066799809
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 86.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262
- The paper
- Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
