Cited by 50EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Critical Thinking and Speaking Proficiency: A Mixed-method Study

Open access
Sanavi, Reza Vahdani, Tarighat, Samaneh·2014·Theory and Practice in Language Studies

Abstract

The present study was intended to investigate the impact of teaching critical thinking skills on the speaking proficiency of Iranian EFL learners in Tehran, how this impact is explained and the participants' attitudes towards explicit critical-thinking content.To achieve this goal, two groups of female Iranian intermediate EFL learners were compared on their speaking performance, with one group having been trained in critical thinking explicitly and the other as the control group.Both groups were tested prior to and after the training of the experimental group was performed.A mixed-method approach was employed in the analysis of the data.In the quantitative analysis, a quasi-experimental method was adopted to investigate the impact of teaching critical thinking skills on the speaking proficiency of the experimental group in comparison with the control group.The results indicated that teaching critical thinking explicitly has a significantly positive impact on the speaking proficiency of female Iranian adult intermediate EFL learners.Through the qualitative approach, the participants' attitudes towards their training in critical thinking were studied during in-depth interviews.The results are described in detail.Accordingly, explicit instruction of critical thinking in the English class can make a deeper impression of the language taught.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4304/tpls.4.1.79-87

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanavi, R. V., & Tarighat, S.
Affiliations
Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
Venue
Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
1799-2591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977719084
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Theory and Practice in Language Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
critical thinking, speaking proficiency, explicit instruction, EFL learners, adult learners, student attitudes, English as a foreign language, Iranian learners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review