JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory
Open accessAbstract
We generalize the recently discovered relationship between JT gravity and double-scaled random matrix theory to the case that the boundary theory may have time-reversal symmetry and may have fermions with or without supersymmetry. The matching between variants of JT gravity and matrix ensembles depends on the assumed symmetries. Time-reversal symmetry in the boundary theory means that unorientable spacetimes must be considered in the bulk. In such a case, the partition function of JT gravity is still related to the volume of the moduli space of conformal structures, but this volume has a quantum correction and has to be computed using Reidemeister-Ray-Singer "torsion." Presence of fermions in the boundary theory (and thus a symmetry $(-1)^F$) means that the bulk has a spin or pin structure. Supersymmetry in the boundary means that the bulk theory is associated to JT supergravity and is related to the volume of the moduli space of super Riemann surfaces rather than of ordinary Riemann surfaces. In all cases we match JT gravity or supergravity with an appropriate random matrix ensemble. All ten standard random matrix ensembles make an appearance -- the three Dyson ensembles and the seven Altland-Zirnbauer ensembles. To facilitate the analysis, we extend to the other ensembles techniques that are most familiar in the case of the original Wigner-Dyson ensemble of hermitian matrices. We also generalize Mirzakhani's recursion for the volumes of ordinary moduli space to the case of super Riemann surfaces.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
JT gravity has a full non-perturbative dual description in terms of an ensemble of random matrices.
“In fact JT gravity has a full non-perturbative dual description in terms of an ensemble of random matrices[226,227].”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [227]
Cites
Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet
Sachdev, S., & Ye, J. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.3339 · Cited by 1,910 · see citing works
Jensen, K. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.111601 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
Solving the Schwarzian via the conformal bootstrap
Mertens, T. G., Turiaci, G. J., & Verlinde, H. L. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2017)136 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model as Liouville quantum mechanics
Bagrets, D., Altland, A., & Kamenev, A. (2016) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.08.002 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Complexity of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Brown, A. R., Gharibyan, H., Lin, H. W., Susskind, L., Thorlacius, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.046016 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Nearly AdS2 sugra and the super-Schwarzian
Förste, S., & Golla, I. (2017) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.05.039 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Free energy from replica wormholes
Engelhardt, N., Fischetti, S., & Maloney, A. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.046021 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
2D dilaton-gravity, deformations of the minimal string, and matrix models
Turiaci, G. J., Usatyuk, M., & Weng, W. W. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac25df · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review
Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“16 In fact JT gravity has a full non-perturbative dual description in terms of an ensemble of random matrices [218,219].”
BackgroundOn 2D gauge theories in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Iliesiu, L. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.05253 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stanford, D., & Witten, E.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Advanced Study (US)
- Venue
- Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
- Publisher
- International Press of Boston
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1475-1680
- ISSN
- 1095-0753 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-0761
- OpenAlex
- W2954629904
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 20.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1606531)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Random Matrices and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Keywords
- JT gravity, random matrix ensembles, time-reversal symmetry, fermions, supersymmetry, super Riemann surfaces, partition function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review