The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gauge theory, ramification, and the geometric Langlands program
Open accessAbstract
In the gauge theory approach to the geometric Langlands program, ramification can be described in terms of "surface operators," which are supported on two-dimensional surfaces somewhat as Wilson or 't Hooft operators are supported on curves.We describe the relevant surface operators in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory, and the parameters they depend on, and analyze how S-duality acts on these parameters.Then, after compactifying on a Riemann surface, we show that the hypothesis of S-duality for surface operators leads to a natural extension of the geometric Langlands program for the case of tame ramification.The construction involves an action of the affine Weyl group on the cohomology of the moduli space of Higgs bundles with ramification, and an action of the affine braid group on A-branes or B-branes on this space.Contents 3.7.Action Of The Affine Weyl Group 97 3.8.Nahm's Equations And Local Singularity Of M H 102 3.9.The Hitchin Fibration 108 4. Geometric Langlands With Tame Ramification 110 4.1.Review Of Unramified Case 110 4.2.Sigma Model With Ramification 111 4.3.Branes 114 4.4.Twisted D-Modules 116 4.5.Line Operators And Monodromies 124 4.6.Representations And Branes 131 5. Line Operators And Ramification 135 5.1.General Framework 136 5.2.The B-Model 139 5.3.The A-Model 141 6. Local Models And Realizations By String Theory 153 6.1.Overview 153 6.2.Linear Sigma Model For G C = SL(2, C) 155 6.3.Instantons And The Local Singularity 161 6.4.Some String Theory Constructions 164 Appendix A. Review Of Duality 168 Appendix B.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 · Cited by 14,524
The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and SupergravityPreprint
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Cited by 11,886
The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1999) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1026654312961 · Cited by 6,704
Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory
Humphreys, J. E. (1972) · Graduate texts in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6398-2 · Cited by 4,808
Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial
Witten, E. (1989) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01217730 · Cited by 4,758
Self-citationMagnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories
Hooft, G. '. (1974) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90486-6 · Cited by 3,379
Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology
Bott, R., & Tu, L. W. (1982) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0 · Cited by 2,743
Wilson Loops in LargeNField Theories
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.4859 · Cited by 1,938
The Yang-Mills equations over Riemann surfaces
Atiyah, M. F., & Bott, R. (1983) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.1983.0017 · Cited by 1,885
Dixon, L., Harvey, J. A., Vafa, C., & Witten, E. (1985) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90593-0 · Cited by 1,815
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gukov, S., & Witten, E.
- Venue
- Current Developments in Mathematics
- Publisher
- International Press of Boston
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 2006
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-180
- ISSN
- 1089-6384 (ISSN-L)
- 2164-4829
- OpenAlex
- W1976431822
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 30.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gauge theory, ramification, and the geometric Langlands program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4310/cdm.2006.v2006.n1.a2
- The paper
- Gukov, S., & Witten, E. (2006). Gauge theory, ramification, and the geometric Langlands program. Current Developments in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.4310/cdm.2006.v2006.n1.a2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.