Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proof of the Riemannian Penrose Inequality Using the Positive Mass Theorem

Bray, Hubert L.·2001·Journal of Differential Geometry

Abstract

We prove the Riemannian Penrose Conjecture, an important case of a conjecture [41] made by Roger Penrose in 1973, by defining a new flow of metrics. This flow of metrics stays inside the class of asymptotically flat Riemannian 3-manifolds with nonnegative scalar curvature which contain minimal spheres. In particular, if we consider a Riemannian 3-manifold as a totally geodesic submanifold of a space-time in the context of general relativity, then outermost minimal spheres with total area $A$ correspond to apparent horizons of black holes contributing a mass $\sqrt{A/16\pi}$, scalar curvature corresponds to local energy density at each point, and the rate at which the metric becomes flat at infinity corresponds to total mass (also called the ADM mass). The Riemannian Penrose Conjecture then states that the total mass of an asymptotically flat 3-manifold with nonnegative scalar curvature is greater than or equal to the mass contributed by the black holes. The flow of metrics we define continuously evolves the original 3-metric to a Schwarzschild 3-metric, which represents a spherically symmetric black hole in vacuum. We define the flow such that the area of the minimal spheres (which flow outward) and hence the mass contributed by the black holes in each of the metrics in the flow is constant, and then use the Positive Mass Theorem to show that the total mass of the metrics is nonincreasing. Then since the total mass equals the mass of the black hole in a Schwarzschild metric, the Riemannian Penrose Conjecture follows. We also refer the reader to the beautiful work of Huisken and Ilmanen [30], who used inverse mean curvature flows of surfaces to prove that the total mass is at least the mass contributed by the largest black hole.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4310/jdg/1090349428

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The classical Penrose inequality bounds the total mass M of a D ≥ 4 asymptotically flat or AdS spacetime with a marginally trapped surface σ below by the area A[σ] as in Eq. (7.11).

    “Loosely speaking, assuming there are no naked singularities and collapsing matter settles to a Kerr black hole, then the total mass M for a D ≥ 4-dimensional asymptotically flat [305][306][307][308] or AdS spacetime [309,310] with a marginally trapped surface σ is bounded below by the area A[σ]”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [306]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. H. L. Bray, "The Penrose Inequality in General Relativity and Volume Comparison Theorems Involving Scalar Curvature," thesis, Stanford Uni- versity, 1997.
  2. Bunting, Masood-ul-Alam, "Non-Existence of Multiple Black Holes in Asymptotically Euclidean Static Vacuum Space-Time," Gen. Rel. and Grav., Vol. 19, No. 2, 1987.
  3. M. Cai and G. Galloway, "Rigidity of Area Minimizing Tori in 3-Manifolds of Nonnegative Scalar Curvature," Comm. in Anal. and Geom. (to appear), math.DG/9804096. · arXiv
  4. F. Finster, "Local U (2, 2) Symmetry in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics," hep-th/9703083, J. Math. Phys. 39, 6276-6290 (1998). · arXiv
  5. G. Gibbons, "Collapsing Shells and the Isoperimetric Inequality for Black Holes," Univ. of Cambridge, preprint, 1997.
  6. D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, 1983.
  7. S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, "The Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and Cosmology," Proc. Roy. Soc. A 314 (1970) 529-548.
  8. G. Huisken and T. Ilmanen, "A Note on Inverse Mean Curvature Flow," Proceedings of the Workshop on Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (Saitama University, Sept. 1997), available from Saitama University, also http://www.math.nwu.edu/∼ilmanen.
  9. U. Massari and M. Miranda, Minimal Surfaces of Codimension One, North- Holland mathematics studies 91, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1984.
  10. R. Schoen, "Variational Theory for the Total Scalar Curvature Functional for Riemannian Metrics and Related Topics,"Topics in Calculus of Varia- tions (M. Giaquinta, ed.) Lecture Notes in Math., 1365, 120-154, Springer, Berlin, 1987.
  11. R. Schoen and S.-T. Yau, "Existence of Incompressible Minimal Surfaces and the Topology of Three Dimensional Manifolds with Non-negative Scalar Curvature," Annals of Mathematics, 110 (1979), 127-142.
  12. L. Simon, "Existence of Surfaces Minimizing the Willmore Functional," Comm. Anal. Geom., Vol. 1, Number 2, 281-326, 1993.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bray, H. L.
Venue
Journal of Differential Geometry
Published
2001-10-01
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
177-267
ISSN
0022-040X
Cited by
222
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review