Cited by 74Advanced Differential Geometry ResearchGeometric and Algebraic TopologyGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows

Nonstandard Lorentz space forms

Open access
Goldman, William M.·1985·Journal of Differential Geometry

Abstract

In their recent paper [8], Kulharni and Raymond show that a closed 3-manifold which admits a complete Lorentz metric of constant curvature 1 (henceforth called a complete Lorentz structure) must be Seifert fibered over a hyperbolic base. Furthermore on every such Seifert fibered 3-manifold with nonzero Euler class they construct such a Lorentz metric. Moreover the Lorentz structure they construct has a rather strong additional property, which they call "standard": A Lorentz structure is standard if its causal double cover possesses a timelike Killing vector field. Equivalently, it possesses a Rieman-nian metric locally isometric to a left-invariant metric on SL(2, R). Kulkarni and Raymond asked if every closed 3-dimensional Lorentz structure is stan-dard. This paper provides a negative answer to this question (Theorem 1) and a positive answer to the implicit question raised in [8, 7.1.1] (Theorem 3). Theorem 1. Let M3 be a closed 3-manifold which admits a homogeneous Lorentz structure and satisfies Hι{M \\ R) Φ 0. Then there exists a nonstandard complete Lorentz structure on M. In [8] it is shown that the unit tangent bundle of a closed surface admits a homogeneous Lorentz structure. Therefore we obtain: Corollary 2. There exists a complete Lorentz structure on the unit tangent bundle of any closed surface F of genus greater than one which is not standard. The homogeneous Lorentz structures are all classified in [8]. A circle bundle of Euler number j over a closed surface F, χ(F) < 0, has a homogeneous structure if and only if j\\χ(F) (an analogous statement holds when M has singular fibers, i.e. when F is an orbifold). We also show: Theorem 3. Let M3 be a 3-manifold which admits a complete Lorentz structure. Then M3 is not covered by a product F X Sι, Fa closed surface. Theorem 3 implies that the Euler class of the Seifert fiber structure of M3 is nonzero.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4310/jdg/1214439567

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Labourie [52] has shown that the spacetimes in Proposition 16 are foliated by spacelike convex surfaces of constant curvature.

    “Labourie [52] has shown that the spacetimes in proposition 16 are foliated by spacelike convex surfaces of constant curvature; these surfaces are dual to surfaces of constant curvature in hyperbolic space.”

    From Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature (2007) · cites this paper as [52]

    In the section “Nonstandard Lorentz Space Forms” (page unavailable), Goldman discusses deformations of complete Lorentz structures, not foliations by spacelike convex constant-curvature surfaces. Searches for Labourie, Proposition 16, and such surfaces found no passage addressing the attributed result; the paper’s discussion of a foliation concerns a flat bundle instead. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. R. Brooks & W. Goldman, The Godbillon-Vey invariant of a transversely homogeneous codimension one foliation, Trans. Amer Math. Soc. 286 (1984) 651-664.
  2. W. Goldman, Discontinuous groups and the Euler class, Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1980.
  3. W. Goldman & M. W. Hirsch, The radiance obstruction and parallel forms on affine manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 286 (1984) 629-649.
  4. R. Kulkarni, K. B. Lee & F. Raymond, Deformation spaces of standard Lorentz structures, Proc. Special Year in Topology, University of Maryland 1983-1984, Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, to appear.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldman, W. M.
Corresponding author
Goldman, William M.
Venue
Journal of Differential Geometry
Published
1985-01-01
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
301-308
ISSN
0022-040X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1574933925
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Differential Geometry (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Keywords
closed 3-manifolds, Euler class, product manifolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review