Nonstandard Lorentz space forms
Open accessAbstract
In their recent paper [8], Kulharni and Raymond show that a closed 3-manifold which admits a complete Lorentz metric of constant curvature 1 (henceforth called a complete Lorentz structure) must be Seifert fibered over a hyperbolic base. Furthermore on every such Seifert fibered 3-manifold with nonzero Euler class they construct such a Lorentz metric. Moreover the Lorentz structure they construct has a rather strong additional property, which they call "standard": A Lorentz structure is standard if its causal double cover possesses a timelike Killing vector field. Equivalently, it possesses a Rieman-nian metric locally isometric to a left-invariant metric on SL(2, R). Kulkarni and Raymond asked if every closed 3-dimensional Lorentz structure is stan-dard. This paper provides a negative answer to this question (Theorem 1) and a positive answer to the implicit question raised in [8, 7.1.1] (Theorem 3). Theorem 1. Let M3 be a closed 3-manifold which admits a homogeneous Lorentz structure and satisfies Hι{M \\ R) Φ 0. Then there exists a nonstandard complete Lorentz structure on M. In [8] it is shown that the unit tangent bundle of a closed surface admits a homogeneous Lorentz structure. Therefore we obtain: Corollary 2. There exists a complete Lorentz structure on the unit tangent bundle of any closed surface F of genus greater than one which is not standard. The homogeneous Lorentz structures are all classified in [8]. A circle bundle of Euler number j over a closed surface F, χ(F) < 0, has a homogeneous structure if and only if j\\χ(F) (an analogous statement holds when M has singular fibers, i.e. when F is an orbifold). We also show: Theorem 3. Let M3 be a 3-manifold which admits a complete Lorentz structure. Then M3 is not covered by a product F X Sι, Fa closed surface. Theorem 3 implies that the Euler class of the Seifert fiber structure of M3 is nonzero.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Labourie [52] has shown that the spacetimes in Proposition 16 are foliated by spacelike convex surfaces of constant curvature.
“Labourie [52] has shown that the spacetimes in proposition 16 are foliated by spacelike convex surfaces of constant curvature; these surfaces are dual to surfaces of constant curvature in hyperbolic space.”
From Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature (2007) · cites this paper as [52]
In the section “Nonstandard Lorentz Space Forms” (page unavailable), Goldman discusses deformations of complete Lorentz structures, not foliations by spacelike convex constant-curvature surfaces. Searches for Labourie, Proposition 16, and such surfaces found no passage addressing the attributed result; the paper’s discussion of a foliation concerns a flat bundle instead. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- R. Brooks & W. Goldman, The Godbillon-Vey invariant of a transversely homogeneous codimension one foliation, Trans. Amer Math. Soc. 286 (1984) 651-664.
- W. Goldman, Discontinuous groups and the Euler class, Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1980.
- W. Goldman & M. W. Hirsch, The radiance obstruction and parallel forms on affine manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 286 (1984) 629-649.
- R. Kulkarni, K. B. Lee & F. Raymond, Deformation spaces of standard Lorentz structures, Proc. Special Year in Topology, University of Maryland 1983-1984, Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, to appear.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature
Mess, G. (2007) · Geometriae Dedicata · doi:10.1007/s10711-007-9155-7 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature
Mess, G. (2007) · arXiv · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goldman, W. M.
- Corresponding author
- Goldman, William M.
- ORCID
- Goldman, William M.
- Venue
- Journal of Differential Geometry
- Publisher
- International Press of Boston
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-308
- ISSN
- 0022-040X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1574933925
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Differential Geometry (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Keywords
- closed 3-manifolds, Euler class, product manifolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review