Geometric quantization of Chern-Simons gauge theory
Open accessAbstract
We present a new construction of the quantum Hubert space of Chern-Simons gauge theory using methods which are natural from the threedimensional point of view.To show that the quantum Hubert space associated to a Riemann surface Σ is independent of the choice of complex structure on Σ, we construct a natural projectively flat connection on the quantum Hubert bundle over Teichmuller space.This connection has been previously constructed in the context of two-dimensional conformal field theory where it is interpreted as the stress energy tensor.Our construction thus gives a (2 + 1 )-dimensional derivation of the basic properties of (1 + 1)-dimensional current algebra.To construct the connection we show generally that for affine symplectic quotients the natural projectively flat connection on the quantum Hubert bundle may be expressed purely in terms of the intrinsic Kahler geometry of the quotient and the Quillen connection on a certain determinant line bundle.The proof of most of the properties of the connection we construct follows surprisingly simply from the index theorem identities for the curvature of the Quillen connection.As an example, we treat the case when Σ has genus one explicitly.We also make some preliminary comments concerning the Hubert space structure.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For compact gauge groups, the quantization of Chern-Simons theory is well understood.
“For compact gauge groups, the quantization of Chern-Simons theory is well understood [278, 243, 244, 116, 34].”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Principles of Algebraic Geometry
Griffiths, P., & Harris, J. (1994) · Wiley · doi:10.1002/9781118032527 · Cited by 6,765 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- M. F. Atiyah, New invariants of three and four dimensional manifolds, The Mathematical Heritage of Hermann Weyl (R. Wells, ed.), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. 48, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, RI, 1988.
- M. F. Atiyah & R. Bott, The Yang-Mills equations over Riemann surfaces, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 308 (1982) 523.
- R. Dijkgraaf & E. Witten, Topological gauge theories and group cohomology, Institute for Advanced Study, preprint HEP-89/33.
- S. Elitzur, G. Moore, A. Schwimmer & N. Seiberg, Remarks on the canonical quanti- zation of the Chern-Simons-Witten theory, Institute for Advanced Study, preprint HEP-89/20.
- J. Fay, Perturbations of analytic torsion on Riemann surfaces, preprint, 1980.
- _, On determinant line bundles, Math. Aspects of String Theory (S. T. Yau, ed.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1987.
- K. Gawkedzki & A. Kupiainen, Coset construction from functional integrals, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. preprint P/88/45.
- N. Hitchin, Flat connections and geometric quantization, Oxford preprint, 1989.
- B. Kostant, Orbits, symplectic structures, and representation theory, Proc. U.S.-Japan Seminar in Differential Geometry (Kyoto, 1965), Quantization And Unitary Repre- sentations, Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 170, Springer, Berlin, 1970, 87; Line Bun- dles And the Prequantized Schrodinger Equation, Coll. Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, Marseille, 1972, 81.
- G. Moore and N. Seiberg, Polynomial equations for rational conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 360; Naturality in conformal field theory, Institute for Advanced Study, preprint HEP/88/31 (to appear in Nuclear Phys. B); Classical and quantum conformal field theory, Institute for Advanced Study, preprint HEP/88/39 (to appear in Nuclear Phys. B).
- D. Mumford & J. Fogarty, Geometric invariant theory, Springer, Berlin, 1982.
- A. Pressley & G. Segal, Loop groups, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1988.
- T. R. Ramadas, I. M. Singer & J. Weitsman, Some comments on Chern-Simons gauge theory, MIT, preprint.
- N. Yu. Reshetikhin & V. G. Turaev, Invariants of three-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. preprint, 1989.
- K.-H. Rehren & B. Schroer, Einstein causality andArtin braids, FU preprint, 1987.
- A. S. Schwarz, New topological invariants arising in the theory of quantized fields, Ab- stract, Baku International Topological Conference, 1987.
- G. Segal, Two-dimensional conformal field theories and modular functors, IXth Internat. Conf. on Math. Physics (Swansea, July, 1988) (
- B. Simon, A. Truman, and I. M. Davies, eds.), Adam Hilger, 1989, 22-37.
- J. Sniatycki, Geometric quantization and quantum mechanics, Springer, New York, 1980.
- A. Tsuchiya, K. Ueno & Y. Yamada, Conformal field theory on universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries, Max Planck Institute, preprint, 1989.
- N. Woodhouse, Geometric quantization, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1980.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory I
Alekseev, A. Y., Grosse, H., & Schomerus, V. (1995) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099431 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe
Carlip, S. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-1 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory II
Alekseev, A. Y., Grosse, H., & Schomerus, V. (1996) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02101528 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
- Authors
- Axelrod, S., Della Pietra, S., & Witten, E.
- ORCID
- Witten, Edward
- Venue
- Journal of Differential Geometry
- Publisher
- International Press of Boston
- Published
- 1991-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 787-902
- ISSN
- 0022-040X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1897085511
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 17.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Differential Geometry (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (8620266, 8817521)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
- Keywords
- Chern-Simons theory, geometric quantization, quantum Hilbert space, Teichmüller space, projectively flat connections, current algebra, determinant line bundle, index theorem, Riemann surfaces, genus one
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review