The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emerging practices in community development agreements
Open accessAbstract
Community Development Agreements (CDAs) have the potential to facilitate the delivery of tangible benefits from large-scale investment projects, such as mines or forestry concessions, to affected persons and communities. To be effective, however, CDAs must be adapted to the local context, meaning that no single model agreement or process will be appropriate in every situation. Nonetheless, leading practices are emerging which can be required by governments, voluntarily adopted by companies, and demanded by communities. These practices are grounded in ensuring that all parties are sufficiently informed, capacitated, and prepared to engage in meaningful negotiations regarding how the investor’s operations should benefit local stakeholders. This article reviews existing research on CDAs, as well as available agreements from the extractive sector in Australia, Canada, Laos, Papua New Guinea, Ghana and Greenland. It articulates seven broad leading practices and how different stakeholders could work to achieve more effective agreements.Keywords: Community development agreement, extractive, investment, leading practices
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The need for investors to establish workable relations with local actors has fostered the negotiation of communityinvestor agreements aimed at channelling benefits to the local economy.”
From Reconsidering Sovereignty, Ownership and Consent in Natural Resource Contracts: From Concepts to Practice (2018) · cites this paper as Loutit et al. (2016)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cotula, L. (2018) · European Yearbook of International Economic Law · doi:10.1007/8165_2018_23 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Loutit, J., Mandelbaum, J., & Szoke-Burke, S.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- ORCID
- Szoke-Burke, Sam
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The)
- Publisher
- African Journals Online (AJOL)
- Published
- 2016-07-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64
- ISSN
- 2467-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 2467-8406
- OpenAlex
- W2494613701
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
- Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
- Keywords
- extractive industries, large-scale investment projects, stakeholder engagement, benefit sharing, mining concessions, local communities, leading practices, corporate social responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging practices in community development agreements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4314/jsdlp.v7i1.4
- The paper
- Loutit, J., Mandelbaum, J., & Szoke-Burke, S. (2016). Emerging practices in community development agreements. Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The). https://doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v7i1.4