Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisTraffic and Road Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Psychoactive Substance Use Among Long Distance Vehicle Drivers In Ilorin, Nigeria

Makanjuola, B A, Oyeleke, S A, Akande, T M·2008·Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Globally, the association between psychoative substance use and accidental injury or death has been acknowledged, with efforts being made to reduce accident rates in all means of transportation. While many studies have examined the use of psychoactive substances among many occupational groups, including drivers, not many has focused on substances use among long distance vehicle drivers. Aim We determined the prevalence, pattern and factors associated with the use of psychoactive substances among long distance vehicle (LDV) drivers in Ilorin, Nigeria. Method All consecutive consenting LDV drivers seen at the study period were interviewed using a modified, pilot-tested, semi-structed self-report questionnaire based on the World Health Organisation\'s guideliness for student\'s substance use survey. Result It was found that the most currently used psychoactive substances were mild stimulants (31.9%), cigrattes (30.4%), anabolic steroids (27.5%) and alcohol (15.9%). Except for cigrattes, the other substances were used mainly for instrumental purposes. Only about 50% of the respondents had ever attended a health talk on drug abuse. High level of religiousity was less likely to be associated with current use of mild stimulants and sedatives. Current use of sedatives was also significantly associated with poor mental health. Conclusion With only 50% exposure to drug abuse campaign among drivers, we suggest that more efforts should be made to enlighten LDV drivers on the dangers of substances use and abuse. Such campaigns should take advantage of religion and the strong influence of the Driver\'s Unions on member. These efforts, we hope, will go a long way in reducing loss of lives and properties on our roads. Though no significant association was found between current drug use and rate of accidents, we suggest a larger scope study be conducted to corroborate or refute this finding. Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 14-18

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4314/njpsyc.v5i1.39895

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

1 more claim about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Makanjuola, B. A., Oyeleke, S. A., & Akande, T. M.
Venue
Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
ScopeMed
Published
2008-01-15
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
0189-1774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006781236
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
drug use, occupational drug use, stimulants, sedatives, alcohol consumption, anabolic steroids, cigarette smoking, religiosity, mental health, traffic accidents, Ilorin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.