The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Historical Development of the Written Discourses on Ubuntu
Open accessAbstract
In this article, I demonstrate that the term ‘ubuntu’ has frequently appeared in writing since at least 1846. I also analyse changes in how ubuntu has been defined in written sources in the period 1846 to 2011. The analysis shows that in written sources published prior to 1950, it appears that ubuntu is always defined as a human quality. At different stages during the second half of the 1900s, some authors began to define ubuntu more broadly: definitions included ubuntu as African humanism, a philosophy, an ethic, and as a worldview. Furthermore, my findings indicate that it was during the period from 1993 to 1995 that the Nguni proverb ‘umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu’ (often translated as ‘a person is a person through other persons’) was used for the first time to describe what ubuntu is. Most authors today refer to the proverb when describing ubuntu, irrespective of whether they consider ubuntu to be a human quality, African humanism, a philosophy, an ethic, or a worldview.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa
Hatchard, J. (1994) · Journal of African Law · doi:10.1017/s0021855300011499 · Cited by 4,173
Tutu, A. D. (1999) · New Perspectives Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5842.1999.tb00012.x · Cited by 2,866
African philosophy through ubuntu
Ramose, M. B. (1999) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 1,063
Biko, S. (1981) · Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies · doi:10.5070/f7111017260 · Cited by 812
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1993, Act 108 of 1996
Davis, D. (1997) · South African Journal on Human Rights · doi:10.1080/02587203.1997.11834934 · Cited by 660
Mandela, N. (2022) · Picturegoers · doi:10.2307/jj.28460435.76 · Cited by 642
The Oxford History of South Africa
Coghlan, T., Wilson, M., & Thompson, L. (1969) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1795128 · Cited by 574
Coetzee, P. H., & Roux, A. P. J. (2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203493229 · Cited by 461
Ubuntu : an ethic for a new South Africa
Shutte, A. (2001) · Cited by 378
The Notion of Ubuntu and Communalism in African Educational Discourse
Venter, E. (2004) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1023/b:sped.0000024428.29295.03 · Cited by 245
Cited by
Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review
Ewuoso, C., & Hall, S. (2019) · South African Journal of Bioethics and Law · doi:10.7196/sajbl.2019.v12i2.00679 · Cited by 256
Ukuphumelela: Flourishing and the pursuit of a good life, and good health, in Soweto, South Africa
Cele, L., Willen, S. S., Dhanuka, M., & Mendenhall, E. (2021) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100022 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Gade, C. B. N.
- Venue
- South African Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-329
- ISSN
- 0258-0136 (ISSN-L)
- 2073-4867
- OpenAlex
- W1977400122
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 32.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Historical Development of the Written Discourses on Ubuntu. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4314/sajpem.v30i3.69578
- The paper
- Gade, C. B. N. (2011). The Historical Development of the Written Discourses on Ubuntu. South African Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajpem.v30i3.69578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.