The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A detailed analysis of evolution of water rights in South Africa: An account of three and a half centuries from 1652 AD to present#
Open accessAbstract
This study reviews the changing scene of water rights in South Africa over the last three and a half centuries and concludes that they have come full circle, with some modifications, since the invoking of Dutch rule in the Cape in 1652 AD. The study stipulates that adoption of a modern rights structure is a welcome change and a progressive step taken by the democratic government; however, its success depends to a great extent on the institutional efficiency of the state which performs the role of trustee or custodian of the water resource. The responsibilities of trusteeship with respect to managing water rights or permits are met through a decentralised decision-making system. The management of water rights/permits thus depends on the administrative and judicial efficiency of organisations and government departments. Therein lurks thedanger of corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, and insecurity of permits, and hence enough potential to stifle the long-term incentives to invest in the water sector.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The 1956 National Water Act, building upon the previous Act, retained and further refined the distinction between private and public water (Tewari 2009).”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Tewari 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Consequently, the National Water Act (1956 ) merged riparian rights with the state's dominus fluminis sta -tus, consolidating power and control over water in the apartheid government's hands (Kidd 2009: 92; Tewari 2009: 701).”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Tewari 2009: 701
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The settler administration did not implement a uniform policy for indigenous communities, as water rights were granted to specific groups such as 'colonists,' 'Dutch,' 'British,' and 'Afrikaners' (Tewari 2009).”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Tewari 2009
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It delineated the rights to use public water for agricultural, urban, and industrial purposes.”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Tewari 2009
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This legislation established stringent water abstraction, allocation, and utilisation regulations, effectively centralising authority and decision-making within the state apparatus.”
From Exclusion and invented water scarcity: a historical perspective from colonialism to apartheid in South Africa (2024) · cites this paper as Tewari 2009: 701
2 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- VAN KOPPEN BCM (2005) The relevance of the histories of water laws in Europe and its former colonies for the rural poor today. Paper presented at the workshop on African water Laws, 26-28 January, 2005, Johannesburg, South Africa,.
- WLRP (WATER LAW REVIEW PANEL) (1996) Fundamental Principles and Objectives for a New water Law in South Africa. Report to the Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry of the Water Law Review Panel. January 1996, Pretoria.
Cited by
The Water Act, No. 54 of 1956 and the first phase of apartheid in South Africa (1948–1960)
Tempelhoff, J. (2017) · Water History · doi:10.1007/s12685-016-0181-y · Cited by 28
Kaziboni, A. (2024) · Water History · doi:10.1007/s12685-024-00339-4 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Tewari, D.
- Affiliations
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Tewari, DD
- Venue
- Water SA
- Publisher
- Academy of Science of South Africa
- Published
- 2009-12-15
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0378-4738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155562122
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Water SA (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Water Resources and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
- Keywords
- water rights, South Africa, Cape Colony, water governance, decentralized decision-making, water permits, institutional efficiency, corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A detailed analysis of evolution of water rights in South Africa: An account of three and a half centuries from 1652 AD to present#. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4314/wsa.v35i5.49196
- The paper
- Tewari, D. (2009). A detailed analysis of evolution of water rights in South Africa: An account of three and a half centuries from 1652 AD to present#. Water SA. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v35i5.49196
