The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Modelling the filling rate of pit latrines
Open accessAbstract
Excreta (faeces and urine) that are deposited into a pit latrine are subject to biodegradation, which substantially reduces the volume that remains. On the other hand, other matter that is not biodegradable usually finds itsway into pit latrines. The net filling rate is thus dependent on both the rate of addition of material and its composition. A simple material balance model is presented which represents the faecal sludge as a mixture of biodegradable organic material, un-biodegradable organic material and inorganic material. Measurements made on 2 pits in eThekwini, South Africa, were used to determine parameters for the model. Model predictions were then compared with data from 15 other pits in the same area and filling rate data from previous South African studies, which exhibit a 20th to 80th percentile range of 200 to 453 ℓ∙pit−1∙yr−1. These comparisons indicated that the pits studied exhibited relatively low filling rates resulting from orderly disposal practices. The average composition of the pit (COD, biodegradable material and inorganic fraction) changes with age, which will impact on any subsequent sludge treatment process. Pit filling rates are greatly affected by the disposal of solid waste in addition to the faecal material. For the pits studied, the model predicts that the filling time could have been extended from 15 years to over 25 years if all solid waste had been excluded from the pit.Keywords: Pit latrine, filling rate, biodegradation, solid waste disposal
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A simple mass balance model of pit latrine filling predicted that adding non-degradable material to the pit significantly influenced its filling.
“A simple mass balance model of pit latrine filling developed and tested by C Brouckaert, et al. [63] using data from VIPs in South Africa, predicted that adding non-degradable material to the pit significantly influenced its filling.”
From Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances (2015) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Brouckaert, C., Foxon, K., & Wood, K.
- Affiliations
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- Venue
- Water SA
- Publisher
- Academy of Science of South Africa
- Published
- 2013-07-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0378-4738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964782098
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Water SA (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Water Research Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
- Keywords
- pit latrines, fecal sludge, biodegradation, mass balance model, solid waste disposal, sludge composition, chemical oxygen demand, sludge treatment, eThekwini
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review