Evidence that ingested nitrate and nitrite are beneficial to health
Open accessAbstract
The literature was reviewed to determine whether ingested nitrate or nitrite may be detrimental or beneficial to human health. Nitrate is ingested when vegetables are consumed. Nitrite, nitrate's metabolite, has a long history of use as a food additive, particularly in cured meat products. Nitrite has been a valuable antibotulinal agent in cured meats and may offer some protection from other pathogens in these products as well. Nitrite's use in food has been clouded by suspicions that nitrite could react with amines in the gastric acid and form carcinogenic nitrosamines, leading to various cancers. Nitrate's safety has also been questioned, particularly with regard to several cancers. Recently, and for related reasons, nitrite became a suspected developmental toxicant. A substantial body of epidemiological evidence and evidence from chronic feeding studies conducted by the National Toxicology Program refute the suspicions of detrimental effects. Recent studies demonstrate that nitrite, upon its ingestion and mixture with gastric acid, is a potent bacteriostatic and/or bactericidal agent and that ingested nitrate is responsible for much of the ingested nitrite. Acidified nitrite has been shown to be bactericidal for gastrointestinal, oral, and skin pathogenic bacteria. Although these are in vitro studies, the possibility is raised that nitrite, in synergy with acid in the stomach, mouth, or skin, may be an element of innate immunity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cured meats generally comprise only 4.8% of daily nitrite intake, and 93% of total nitrite ingestion is derived from saliva, suggesting that cured meats provide minimal contributions to human nitrite intake even if frequently consumed.
“In fact, cured meats have been reported to generally comprise only 4.8% of the daily nitrite intake, and surprisingly, 93% of the total ingestion of nitrite is derived from saliva [114], suggesting that cured meats provide minimal contributions to the human intake of nitrite, even if they are frequently consumed.”
From NO-Rich Diet for Lifestyle-Related Diseases (2015) · cites this paper as [114]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 135
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- In W. S. Wilson, A. H. Ball, and R. H. Hinton (ed.), Managing risks of nitrates to humans and the environment. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.
- In W. S. Wilson, A. H. Ball, and R. H. Hinton (ed.), Managing risks of nitrates to humans and the environment. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.
- In W. S. Wilson, A. H. Ball, and R. H. Hinton (ed.), Man- aging risks of nitrates to humans and the environment. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.
- Moller, H. 1995. Adverse health effects of nitrate and its metabolites: epidemiological studies in humans, p. 255-268. In Health aspects of nitrates and its metabolites (particularly nitrite). Proceedings of the International Workshop. Council of Europe Press, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
- In W. S. Wilson, A. H. Ball, and R. H. Hinton (ed.), Man- aging risks of nitrates to humans and the environment. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.
- Authors
- Archer, D. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Archer, Douglas L.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 872-875
- ISSN
- 0362-028X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097216424
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Food Protection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Keywords
- dietary nitrate, dietary nitrite, cured meat, food additives, nitrosamine formation, cancer risk, developmental toxicity, innate immunity, vegetable consumption, gastric acid
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Food Preservation, Food Preservatives, Humans, Meat Products, Nitrates, Nitrites, Stomach Neoplasms, Global Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review