Inferior alveolar nerve damage related to dental implant placement. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A concern associated with implant placement is the potential occurrence of neurovascular lesions and subsequent development of sensory alterations in patients undergoing implant placements. The objective of this review is to evaluate the incidence of neurosensory alterations based on the proximity between the implant and the mandibular canal Material and Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies with common variables were selected to conduct a meta-analysis. The patient classification was based on the mandibular canal-implant distance. Neurosensory alteration percentages were calculated for each study and group. RESULTS: The findings indicate significant correlations between implant placement proximity and neurosensory risks. The incidence of neurosensory alterations in patients with implants placed at a distance ≥ 2 mm from the mandibular canal was 0%. Similarly, for distances between 1-2 mm from the mandibular canal, the incidence remained at 0%. However, for implants placed at a distance of 0-1 mm from the mandibular canal, the incidence of neurosensory alterations was 68%. Additionally, patients with implants that intruded into the canal had an incidence of 53% in the development of neurosensorial alterations. CONCLUSIONS: A distance of 1 mm from the mandibular canal might be safe. Implants placed at a distance less than 1 mm from the mandibular canal exhibit neurosensory alterations. Clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of nerve injury and adopt appropriate precautions, including meticulous preoperative planning and three-dimensional radiographic images.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Peña-Cardelles, J., Markovic, J., Akhondi, S., Pedrinaci, I., Lanis, A., & Gallucci, G.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal
- Publisher
- Medicina Oral, S.L.
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e578-e589
- ISSN
- 1698-4447 (ISSN-L)
- 1698-6946
- PMC
- PMC12221155
- OpenAlex
- W4409241807
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Keywords
- inferior alveolar nerve injury, dental implants, mandibular canal, implant placement, surgical planning, 3D imaging
- MeSH terms
- Mandibular Nerve Injuries, Dental Implantation, Humans, Dental Implants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review