The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ROLE OF DETRITUS IN THE PRODUCTIVITY OF A ROCK‐OUTCROP COMMUNITY IN A PIEDMONT STREAM
Abstract
A rock outcrop community in a typical southern Piedmont stream was studied to determine its trophic structure and productivity. Podostemum ceratophyllum was the primary producer component of the community and also provided a place of attachment and shelter for a rheophilic fauna consisting largely of insects. The primary consumer organisms derived 66% of their energy from allochthonous organic matter consisting largely of leaf material. Productivity by phytoplankton in the river water was insignificant as was respiration in the shifting sand bottom. The river behaved as a heterotrophic stream because of suspended organic detritus in the water. A higher and more variable quantity of particulate detritus was present in the water during summer than winter. This seasonal difference was attributed to stream discharge—stream bed relationships and a more rapid decomposition of organic fragments at higher summer temperatures. The net annual productivities, determined by the cropping method, in cal/cm 2 for trophic groups were: Podostemum 434, filter feeders 16.8, herbivores 6.51, detritus feeders 1.68, herbivore and detritus feeders 2.78 (total primary consumer 27.8), and carnivore 3.66. The turnover of biomass increased with increasing productivity by individual species but this relationship does not hold true for all communities. A comparison of trophic level production efficiencies and productivities in several communities suggests there are self‐regulating mechanisms in natural communities which function between producer and consumer groups. Community stability is an important factor for the realization of maximum productivity in flowing water environments. A theory of stream succession has been proposed which is based on the graded stream concept.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems
Cummins, K. W. (1974) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1296676 · Cited by 1,413
Stream Ecosystem Theory: A Global Perspective
Minshall, G. W. (1988) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1467294 · Cited by 454
Fungi and Bacteria Associated with Leaves During Processing in a Woodland Stream
Suberkropp, K., & Klug, M. J. (1976) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936184 · Cited by 414
Bott, T. L., Brock, J. T., Dunn, C. S., Naiman, R. J., Ovink, R. W., & Petersen, R. C. (1985) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00006613 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, D. J., & Scott, D. C.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1962-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 396-413
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2064398398
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ROLE OF DETRITUS IN THE PRODUCTIVITY OF A ROCK‐OUTCROP COMMUNITY IN A PIEDMONT STREAM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1962.7.3.0396
- The paper
- Nelson, D. J., & Scott, D. C. (1962). ROLE OF DETRITUS IN THE PRODUCTIVITY OF A ROCK‐OUTCROP COMMUNITY IN A PIEDMONT STREAM. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1962.7.3.0396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.