The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrogenous nutrition of the plankton in the Chesapeake Bay. 1. Nutrient availability and phytoplankton preferences
Abstract
Eight stations in the main body of Chesapeake Bay and one on the continental shelf were sampled seven times over a period of 13 months to investigate the nitrogenous nutrition of the phytoplankton. The rates at which the phytoplankton were utilizing NO 3−, NO 2−, NH 4+, and urea N were determined. The data demonstrate that for a large portion of the year there is inadequate N nutrient available to permit a single doubling of the particulate N. Over temperatures from 4°–28°C and salinities from 2–32‰, there was a universally high phytoplankton preference for NH 4+ and urea N over NO 3− and NO 2−. A relative preference index indicated that NH 4+ concentrations in excess of 0.5–1.0 µ g‐atom N liter−1 almost totally suppressed NO 3− utilization. Urea N was used after NH 4+ in order of preference, and when the sum of available NH 4+ and urea N was insufficient to meet the phytoplankton N nutrient demand, NO 3− was used. When the sum of all available N nutrients was less than that required to satiate the phytoplankton demand, NH 4+, urea N, NO 3−, and NO 2− were all utilized at rates proportional to their availability. For the midbay region in October 1973, NO 2− was the dominant N nutrient present both in the water and in the diet of the phytoplankton.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aspects of the Biology of Frontal Systems
Le Fèvre, J. (1987) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60109-1 · Cited by 433
Nitrogenous Nutrition of Marine Phytoplankton in Nutrient-Depleted Waters
McCarthy, J. J., & Goldman, J. C. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.203.4381.670 · Cited by 431
Self-citationLimitation of productivity by trace metals in the sea
Morel, F. M. M., Hudson, R. J. M., & Price, N. M. (1991) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1742 · Cited by 417
Regulation of nitrate assimilation by ammonium in soils and in isolated soil microorganisms
Rice, C. W., & Tiedje, J. M. (1989) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(89)90135-1 · Cited by 277
Morse, R., Mulholland, M., Egerton, T., & Marshall, H. (2014) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10743 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- McCarthy, J. J., Taylor, W. R., & Taft, J. L.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 996-1011
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2058597471
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogenous nutrition of the plankton in the Chesapeake Bay. 1. Nutrient availability and phytoplankton preferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1977.22.6.0996
- The paper
- McCarthy, J. J., Taylor, W. R., & Taft, J. L. (1977). Nitrogenous nutrition of the plankton in the Chesapeake Bay. 1. Nutrient availability and phytoplankton preferences. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.6.0996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.