The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested1
Abstract
Laboratory study of the bacterial decomposition of Long Island Sound plankton in oxygenated seawater over a period of 2 years shows that the organic material undergoes decomposition via first‐order kinetics and can be divided into two decomposable fractions, of considerably different reactivity, and a nonmetabolizable fraction. This planktonic material, after undergoing varying degrees of oxic degradation, was added in the laboratory to anoxic sediment taken from a depth of 1 m at the NWC site of Long Island Sound and the rate of bacterial sulfate reduction in the sediment measured by the 35S radiotracer technique. The stimulated rate of sulfate reduction was in direct proportion to the amount of planktonic carbon added. This provides direct confirmation of the first‐order decomposition, or G model, for marine sediments and proves that the in situ rate of sulfate reduction is organic‐matter limited. Slower sulfate reduction rates resulted when oxically degraded plankton rather than fresh plankton was added, and the results confirm the presence of the same two fractions of organic matter deduced from the oxic degradation studies. Near‐surface Long Island Sound sediment, which already contains abundant readily decomposable organic matter, was also subjected to anoxic decomposition by bacterial sulfate reduction. The decrease in sulfate reduction rate with time parallels decreases in the amount of organic matter, and these results also indicate the presence of two fractions of organic carbon of distinctly different reactivity. From plots of the log of reduction rate vs. time two first‐order rate constants were obtained that agree well with those derived from the plankton addition experiment. Together, the two experiments confirm the use of a simple multi‐first‐order rate law for organic matter decomposition in marine sediments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sedimentary pyrite formation: An update
Berner, R. A. (1984) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(84)90089-9 · Cited by 2,584
Self-citationBurdige, D. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050347q · Cited by 1,310
Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: A review and synthesis
Arndt, S., Jørgensen, B. B., LaRowe, D. E., Middelburg, J. J., Pancost, R. D., & Regnier, P. (2013) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.008 · Cited by 1,040
Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine sediments
Canfield, D. E. (1994) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/0009-2541(94)90061-2 · Cited by 1,026
Lehmann, M. F., Bernasconi, S. M., Barbieri, A., & McKenzie, J. A. (2002) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(02)00968-7 · Cited by 864
Metadata
- Authors
- Westrich, J. T., & Berner, R. A.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-249
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2124640583
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0236
- The paper
- Westrich, J. T., & Berner, R. A. (1984). The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.