The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of the abilities of freshwater algae and bacteria to acquire and retain phosphorus1
Open accessAbstract
Extant physiological and in situ data provide contradictory answers to the question of whether the bacterioplankton can outcompete the phytoplankton for phosphorus at natural concentrations. Two phytoplankton species and three bacterial species isolated from the epilimnion of Lake Memphremagog, Québec, were grown in phosphorus‐limited continuous cultures and their abilities to take up and retain phosphorus compared. The algae showed orthophosphate uptake kinetics comparable to those reported elsewhere. In contrast, the specific orthophosphate uptake rates (i.e. uptake per unit cell P) by the bacteria were variable, but much higher than the algal rates at the low P concentrations characteristic of natural waters. Algal and bacterial alkaline phosphatase activities were similar and provided no evidence that the algae could utilize organic P more efficiently than the bacteria. The bacteria showed some tendency to excrete P more readily than the algae but mixed culture experiments indicated that excretion did little to alter the long term partitioning of phosphorus between the algae and the bacteria. The kinetic data suggest that planktonic bacteria are unlikely to be limited by phosphorus in situ. Furthermore, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the bacteria should be markedly superior competitors at natural phosphate concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Algae-bacteria interactions: Evolution, ecology and emerging applications
Ramanan, R., Kim, B.-H., Cho, D.-H., Oh, H.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2016) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.003 · Cited by 1,301
The biogeochemical cycling of phosphorus in marine systems
Benitez-Nelson, C. R. (2000) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0012-8252(00)00018-0 · Cited by 732
The influence of humic substances on lacustrine planktonic food chains
Jones, R. I. (1992) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00006992 · Cited by 363
Phosphatases; Origin, Characteristics and Function in Lakes
Jansson, M., Olsson, H., & Pettersson, K. (1988) · Phosphorus in Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3109-1_10 · Cited by 296
Wang, H., Hill, R. T., Zheng, T., Hu, X., & Wang, B. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2014.961402 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Currie, D. J., & Kalff, J.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-310
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2141113240
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the abilities of freshwater algae and bacteria to acquire and retain phosphorus1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0298
- The paper
- Currie, D. J., & Kalff, J. (1984). A comparison of the abilities of freshwater algae and bacteria to acquire and retain phosphorus1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.