Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Symbiotic photosynthesis in a planktonic foraminiferan, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady), studied with microelectrodes1

Jørgensen, Bo Barker, Erez, Jonathan, Revsbech, Peter, Cohen, Yehuda·1985·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

The chemical environment and the symbiotic photosynthesis of the spinose foraminiferan, Globigerinoides sacculifer, from the Gulf of Aqaba, northern Red Sea, were studied with O 2 and pH microelectrodes at a resolution of 50–100 µ m. In the dark, the foraminiferan respiration lowered the O 2 concentration at the shell surface to 50% of air saturation, while pH was lowered from the ambient value of 8.23 to 8.15. In the light, the O 2 increased to 2.5 times air saturation while pH reached 8.62. These steep chemical gradients were established over a diffusive boundary layer between the spines, which partly separated the animal from the bulk seawater. The O 2 pool around the shell was very dynamic, with residence times down to 5 s in the light. Photosynthetic rates were mapped around and within the animal. The compensation light intensity of the symbiont‐host system was 26–30 µ Einst m−2 s−1, while the light saturation intensity, Ik, was 160–170 µ Einst m−2 s−1. The action spectrum of symbiont photosynthesis showed peaks at 450 and 670 nm due to chlorophyll a as well as a broad peridinin peak at 500–550 nm. Total respiration of one symbiont‐host system was 3.0 nmol O 2 h−1 and was not significantly different between dark and light. Gross photosynthesis at light saturation was 18.1 nmol O 2 h−1 per foraminiferan. The high net photosynthesis showed that the zooxanthellae could theoretically provide all organic carbon required for growth and respiration of the host. Model calculations indicated, however, that the foraminifera were diffusion‐limited in the uptake of dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus. The capture of prey was therefore a necessary source of these nutrients, while symbiotic photosynthesis could cover the energy requirements and allow efficient internal recycling of nutrients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1985.30.6.1253

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Jørgensen, B. B., Erez, J., Revsbech, P., & Cohen, Y.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1253-1267
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W1993279125
Cited by
178
References
1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symbiotic photosynthesis in a planktonic foraminiferan, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady), studied with microelectrodes1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1985.30.6.1253
The paper
Jørgensen, B. B., Erez, J., Revsbech, P., & Cohen, Y. (1985). Symbiotic photosynthesis in a planktonic foraminiferan, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady), studied with microelectrodes1. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1985.30.6.1253

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.