The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of microbial dynamics in marine and freshwater sediments: Contrasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism
Abstract
The microbiota of freshwater and marine sediments serve similar roles in carbon degradation and nutrient regeneration. However, because of differences in the chemical environment between freshwater and marine systems, distinct physiological groups of bacteria dominate terminal carbon catabolism in each system. In general, the distribution and rates of microbial activities within a sediment are determined by availability of electron acceptors for respiration and metabolizable organic substrates. Sulfate ion is a primary factor in the distribution of microbial activities in anoxic sediments. At the high sulfate concentration found in seawater, sulfate reduction exceeds methanogenesis and is responsible for most of the organic carbon oxidation. The importance of methanogenesis in sediment metabolism increases as salinity and, hence, sulfate decreases. In freshwaters, methanogenesis is responsible for the bulk of terminal metabolism under anoxic conditions. The higher affinity of sulfate reducers for substrates that can be used by both groups (e.g. hydrogen, acetate, methanol), as well as the more favorable thermodynamic energy yields of sulfate respiration compared to methanogenesis, may account for the dominance of sulfate respiration under sulfate replete conditions. The sources of organic matter to marine and freshwater sediments can be qualitatively different. Complex structural polysaccharides and phenolic polymers (i.e. ligno‐cellulose) may comprise a greater fraction of the organic input to freshwater systems. Organic compounds that act as osmoregulatory solutes in marine plants and animals may be unique substrates for bacteria of marine sediments. It is likely that these differences also result in distinct assemblages of microorganisms responsible for the breakdown of organic carbon. The quantity of organic matter present in the sediments is also a major factor determining the magnitude and distribution of various microbial activities. Near the extremes of high and low organic loading, organic matter input may play a greater role than sulfate concentration in determining the relative importance of sulfate reduction or methanogenesis. In marine systems, methanogenesis occurs in the presence of sulfate ion, but only at the expense of substrates not utilized by sulfate reducers (“noncompetitive” substrates), such as methylamines and, possibly, methylated reduced sulfur compounds. Methanogenesis from noncompetitive substrates represents only a small fraction of the sulfate reduction or carbon catabolism observed in marine sediments. In marine systems with very high rates of organic matter deposition, sulfate can be depleted to the extent that methanogenesis takes on quantitative significance. Although sulfate concentrations are usually insufficient to permit much sulfate reduction in lacustrine environments, in lakes with relatively low organic deposition, sulfate concentrations in the water (and that supplied to the sediments) can be sufficient to allow for a more significant contribution of sulfate respiration to carbon catabolism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Froelich, P. N., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N. A., Heath, G. R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., & Maynard, V. (1979) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4 · Cited by 3,368
A review of sterol markers for marine and terrigenous organic matter
Volkman, J. K. (1986) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/0146-6380(86)90089-6 · Cited by 1,951
Cited by
Metabolic, Phylogenetic, and Ecological Diversity of the Methanogenic Archaea
Liu, Y., & Whitman, W. B. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1419.019 · Cited by 1,346
Use of “Specific” Inhibitors in Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology
Oremland, R. S., & Capone, D. G. (1988) · Advances in Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5409-3_8 · Cited by 498
Self-citationInfluence of Sulfide Inhibition of Nitrification on Nitrogen Regeneration in Sediments
Joye, S. B., & Hollibaugh, J. T. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5236.623 · Cited by 466
Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in Australia
Nielsen, D. L., Brock, M. A., Rees, G. N., & Baldwin, D. S. (2003) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt02115 · Cited by 453
Eglinton, G., & Logan, G. A. (1991) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1991.0081 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- CAPONE, D. G., & KIENE, R. P.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4_part_2
- Pages
- 725-749
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161863453
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of microbial dynamics in marine and freshwater sediments: Contrasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0725
- The paper
- CAPONE, D. G., & KIENE, R. P. (1988). Comparison of microbial dynamics in marine and freshwater sediments: Contrasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.