The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biogeochemistry of carbon in the Amazon River
Abstract
Depth‐integrated, discharge‐weighted water samples were collected over 1,800 km of the Amazon River on eight cruises at different stages of the hydrograph, 1982–1984. Fine (FPOC, <63 µ m) and coarse (CPOC, >63 µ m) particulate organic carbon as weight percentage of suspended sediment varied between 0.9–1.5% for FPOC and 0.5–3.4% for CPOC. Concentrations of FPOC ranged from 5 mg liter−1 upriver to 2 mg liter−1 downriver in the mainstem and from 6 mg liter−1 in the Rio Madeira to <1 in the Rio Negro. CPOC had similar distribution patterns, but with concentrations 15–30% those of FPOC. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) averaged 4–6 mg liter−1 in the mainstem and up to 12 mg liter−1 in the Rio Negro. Upriver dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentrations of about 1,200 µ M were diluted by tributaries and floodplain drainage to 600 µM at the most downriver site. Evasion of CO 2, invasion of O 2, and in situ oxidation were of comparable magnitude, 3–8 µ mol m−2 s−1. The average export of total organic carbon (TOC) was 36.1 Tg yr−1 (8.5 g m−2 yr−1), of which 62% was DOC, 34% was FPOC, and 4% was CPOC. TOC inputs were insufficient to support in situ oxidation by a factor of at least two. A relatively small, rapidly cycling pool of labile organic matter may coexist with a much larger pool of more refractory material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biogeochemical Hot Spots and Hot Moments at the Interface of Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems
McClain, M. E., Boyer, E. W., Dent, C. L., Gergel, S. E., Grimm, N. B., Groffman, P. M., Hart, S. C., Harvey, J. W., Johnston, C. A., Mayorga, E., et al. (2003) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-003-0161-9 · Cited by 2,379
Global biogeochemical cycles: progress and problems
Hedges, J. I. (1992) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0304-4203(92)90096-s · Cited by 892
Self-citationTerrestrial carbon inputs to inland waters: A current synthesis of estimates and uncertainty
Drake, T. W., Raymond, P. A., & Spencer, R. G. M. (2018) · Limnology and Oceanography Letters · doi:10.1002/lol2.10055 · Cited by 707
Do we have enough pieces of the jigsaw to integrate CO2 fluxes in the coastal ocean?
Borges, A. V. (2005) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02732750 · Cited by 414
Storage and release of fossil organic carbon related to weathering of sedimentary rocks
Copard, Y., Amiotte-Suchet, P., & Di-Giovanni, C. (2007) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.03.048 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Richey, J. E., Hedges, J. I., Devol, A. H., Quay, P. D., Victoria, R., Martinelli, L., & Forsberg, B. R.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 352-371
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2111574482
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogeochemistry of carbon in the Amazon River. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1990.35.2.0352
- The paper
- Richey, J. E., Hedges, J. I., Devol, A. H., Quay, P. D., Victoria, R., Martinelli, L., & Forsberg, B. R. (1990). Biogeochemistry of carbon in the Amazon River. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1990.35.2.0352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.