The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ammonium recycling versus denitrification in Chesapeake Bay sediments
Abstract
Contemporaneous measurements are reported for nitrification, denitrification, and net sediment— water fluxes of NH 4+ and NO 3− in the mesohaline region of Chesapeake Bay. Seasonal cycles over a 2‐yr period were characterized by a midsummer maximum in NH 4+ efflux to the overlying water and a May peak in NO 3− removal from water by sediments. Coherent temporal patterns for nitrification and denitrification were observed, with relatively high values in spring and fall and virtual elimination of both processes in summer. Indirect measurements indicate that nitrification was limited by the shallow O 2 penetration (<1 mm) here compared to reports for other marine sediments (2–6 mm). In addition, a strong positive correlation between the two processes suggested that denitrification was generally controlled by nitrification. Comparisons of NO 3− fluxes and net nitrification rates (nitrification minus NO 3− reduction to NH 4+) revealed that measurements of denitrification with the acetylene block method systematically underestimated actual rates. Rates of N 2 loss in denitrification were similar to NH 4+ recycling fluxes to the overlying water in spring and fall, but in summer negligible denitrification contributed to enhanced NH 4+ recycling. These results suggest that inhibition of denitrification in eutrophic estuaries such as Chesapeake Bay may reinforce the effects of nutrient enrichment by allowing increased rates of NH 4+ recycling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GALLOWAY, J. N., ABER, J. D., ERISMAN, J. W., SEITZINGER, S. P., HOWARTH, R. W., COWLING, E. B., & COSBY, B. J. (2003) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:tnc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,973
Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions.
Kemp, W., Boynton, W., Adolf, J., Boesch, D., Boicourt, W., Brush, G., Cornwell, J., Fisher, T., Glibert, P., Hagy, J., et al. (2005) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps303001 · Cited by 1,468
Self-citationClosing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle
Mosier, A., Kroeze, C., Nevison, C., Oenema, O., Seitzinger, S., & van Cleemput, O. (1998) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1023/a:1009740530221 · Cited by 1,198
Influence of Sulfide Inhibition of Nitrification on Nitrogen Regeneration in Sediments
Joye, S. B., & Hollibaugh, J. T. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5236.623 · Cited by 466
Jilbert, T., Slomp, C. P., Gustafsson, B. G., & Boer, W. (2011) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-8-1699-2011 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Kemp, W. M., Sampou, P., Caffrey, J., Mayer, M., Henriksen, K., & Boynton, W. R.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1545-1563
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2110570776
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ammonium recycling versus denitrification in Chesapeake Bay sediments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1990.35.7.1545
- The paper
- Kemp, W. M., Sampou, P., Caffrey, J., Mayer, M., Henriksen, K., & Boynton, W. R. (1990). Ammonium recycling versus denitrification in Chesapeake Bay sediments. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1990.35.7.1545
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.