Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ammonium recycling versus denitrification in Chesapeake Bay sediments

Kemp, W. M., Sampou, P., Caffrey, J., Mayer, M., Henriksen, K., Boynton, W. R.·1990·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

Contemporaneous measurements are reported for nitrification, denitrification, and net sediment— water fluxes of NH 4+ and NO 3− in the mesohaline region of Chesapeake Bay. Seasonal cycles over a 2‐yr period were characterized by a midsummer maximum in NH 4+ efflux to the overlying water and a May peak in NO 3− removal from water by sediments. Coherent temporal patterns for nitrification and denitrification were observed, with relatively high values in spring and fall and virtual elimination of both processes in summer. Indirect measurements indicate that nitrification was limited by the shallow O 2 penetration (<1 mm) here compared to reports for other marine sediments (2–6 mm). In addition, a strong positive correlation between the two processes suggested that denitrification was generally controlled by nitrification. Comparisons of NO 3− fluxes and net nitrification rates (nitrification minus NO 3− reduction to NH 4+) revealed that measurements of denitrification with the acetylene block method systematically underestimated actual rates. Rates of N 2 loss in denitrification were similar to NH 4+ recycling fluxes to the overlying water in spring and fall, but in summer negligible denitrification contributed to enhanced NH 4+ recycling. These results suggest that inhibition of denitrification in eutrophic estuaries such as Chesapeake Bay may reinforce the effects of nutrient enrichment by allowing increased rates of NH 4+ recycling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1990.35.7.1545

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Kemp, W. M., Sampou, P., Caffrey, J., Mayer, M., Henriksen, K., & Boynton, W. R.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-11
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1545-1563
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2110570776
Cited by
439
References
0
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ammonium recycling versus denitrification in Chesapeake Bay sediments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1990.35.7.1545
The paper
Kemp, W. M., Sampou, P., Caffrey, J., Mayer, M., Henriksen, K., & Boynton, W. R. (1990). Ammonium recycling versus denitrification in Chesapeake Bay sediments. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1990.35.7.1545

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.