Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms of inorganic-carbon acquisition in marine phytoplankton and their implications for the use of other resources

Open access
Raven, John A., Johnston, Andrew M.·1991·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

Most of the marine phytoplankton species for which data are available are rate saturated for photosynthesis and probably for growth with inorganic C at normal seawater concentrations; 2 of the 17 species are not saturated. Photosynthesis in these two species can probably be explained by assuming that CO2 reaches the site of its reaction with RUBISCO (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase) by passive diffusion. The kinetics of CO2 fixation by intact cells are explicable by RUBISCO kinetics typical of (eucaryotic) algae, and a CO2-saturated in vivo RUBISCO activity not more than twice the in vivo light- and inorganic-C-saturated rate of photosynthesis. For the other species, the high affinity in vivo for inorganic C (and several other attributes) could be explained by postulating active influx of inorganic C yielding a higher concentration of CO2 available to RUBISCO during steady state photosynthesis than in the medium. Although such a higher concentration of internal CO2 in cells with high affinity for inorganic C is found at low (subseawater) levels of external inorganic C, the situation is more equivocal at normal seawater concentrations. In theory, the occurrence of a CO2 concentrating mechanism rather than passive CO2 entry (with consequent glycolate synthesis and metabolism or excretion) could reduce the photon, N, Fe, Mn, and Mo costs of growth, but increase the Zn and Se costs. Thus far, data on costs are available only for photons and N; these data generally agree with the predicted lower costs for cells with high affinity for inorganic C. The ecological significance of these attributes is that most marine phytoplankters are not likely to have photosynthetic or growth rates reduced by the measured decreases in inorganic C in productive seawater, drawdown of inorganic C in productive seawater (or increase as atmospheric CO2 increases) might alter the competitive balance between cells with low and high affinity for inorganic C, and differences in the effectiveness of use of other resources between cells with high and low affinity could cause differences in the rate and extent of resource-limited growth for communities dominated by high-affinity or low-affinity cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1701

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Raven, J. A., & Johnston, A. M.
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-12
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
1701-1714
ISSN
0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114556293
Cited by
269
References
1
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of inorganic-carbon acquisition in marine phytoplankton and their implications for the use of other resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1701
The paper
Raven, J. A., & Johnston, A. M. (1991). Mechanisms of inorganic-carbon acquisition in marine phytoplankton and their implications for the use of other resources. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.