The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An alternative approach to absorption measurements of aquatic particles retained on filters
Abstract
We made modifications to the procedure used for absorption measurements of aquatic particles retained on glass‐fiber filters that extend the procedure's application range to “case 2” waters with high suspended sediment content and allow the determination of phytoplankton pigment absorption in situations where the standard solvent extraction method is not effective. The first result was achieved by combining light‐transmission and light‐reflection measurements (the latter made possible by the use of a commercially available integrating‐sphere attachment for the dual‐beam spectrophotometer) so as to remove the spurious contribution to the measured absorption caused by sample backscattering. The second result was obtained by bleaching the sample with a NaClO solution‐a method that proved satisfactory even with water‐soluble pigments (e.g. the important class of the phycobilins) and solvent‐resistant Chlorophyceae. This process also allows for depigmentation of the particle suspension, and thus it was used to evaluate the empirical expression for converting the filter‐retained sample absorbance to the equivalent particle suspension value. Both features of the modified procedure have been positively tested through measurements carried out on solvent‐resistant phytoplankton species and on samples of inorganic suspended sediment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Remote Assessment of Ocean Color for Interpretation of Satellite Visible Imagery: A Review
Gordon, H. R., & Morel, A. Y. (1983) · Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies · doi:10.1029/ln004 · Cited by 1,133
Estimation of the spectral absorption coefficients of phytoplankton in the sea
Kishino, M., Takahashi, M., Okami, N., & Ichimura, S. (1985) · Bulletin of Marine Science · Cited by 595
Bricaud, A., & Stramski, D. (1990) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1990.35.3.0562 · Cited by 486
Mitchell, B. G. (1990) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.21440 · Cited by 368
Cleveland, J. S., & Weidemann, A. D. (1993) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1993.38.6.1321 · Cited by 353
Greg Mitchell, B., & Kiefer, D. A. (1988) · Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers · doi:10.1016/0198-0149(88)90024-6 · Cited by 295
MEASUREMENT OF VISIBLE LIGHT ABSORPTION BY PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE OCEAN1
Yentsch, C. S. (1962) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1962.7.2.0207 · Cited by 261
Effect of pigment composition on absorption properties of phytoplankton
Hoepffner, N., & Sathyendranath, S. (1991) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps073011 · Cited by 256
Generalized Integrating-Sphere Theory
Goebel, D. G. (1967) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.6.000125 · Cited by 212
Absorption of Light by Turbid Materials
Butler, W. L. (1962) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.52.000292 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Zeng, C., & Binding, C. (2019) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs11192306 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Tassan, S., & Ferrari, G. M.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1358-1368
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2155601902
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An alternative approach to absorption measurements of aquatic particles retained on filters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1995.40.8.1358
- The paper
- Tassan, S., & Ferrari, G. M. (1995). An alternative approach to absorption measurements of aquatic particles retained on filters. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1995.40.8.1358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.