The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial utilization of different size classes of dissolved organic matter
Abstract
Bacterial utilization of high‐molecular‐weight (HMW; > 1 kDa) and low‐molecular‐weight (LMW; <1 kDa) dissolved organic C (DOC) was investigated in freshwater and marine systems by measuring dissolved oxygen consumption, bacterial abundance, and bacterial production in size‐fractionated samples. Tangential‐flow ultrafiltration was used to separate HMW and LMW DOC. More than 80% of the DOC in Amazon River samples was recovered in the HMW fraction, whereas most marine DOC (up to 70%) was of LMW. Bacterial growth efficiencies were consistently higher in the LMW fractions (16‐66%) than in the HMW fractions (8‐39%), indicating compositional differences in the two size fractions. In all experiments, measured rates of bacterial growth and respiration in HMW incubations were higher than those in LMW incubations. Carbon‐normalized bacterial DOC utilization rates were 1.4–4‐fold greater in the HMW fractions than in the LMW fractions, and a greater proportion (0.7–22.5%) of HMW DOC was utilized per day than LMW DOC (0.5–6.6%). All bacterial growth and respiration measurements indicated that HMW DOC was utilized to a greater extent than LMW DOC in all environments investigated. The traditional model of DOM degradation, stating that LMW compounds are most bioreactive, does not appear to apply to the bulk of natural DOM. Rather, the data and results from independent studies suggest a new conceptual model whereby the bioreactivity of organic matter decreases along a continuum of size (from large to small) and diagenetic state (from fresh to old). This size‐reactivity continuum model suggests that the bulk of HMW DOM is more bioreactive and less diagenetically altered than the bulk of LMW DOM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Minor, E. C., Swenson, M. M., Mattson, B. M., & Oyler, A. R. (2014) · Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts · doi:10.1039/c4em00062e · Cited by 305
Legendre, L., Rivkin, R. B., Weinbauer, M. G., Guidi, L., & Uitz, J. (2015) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2015.01.008 · Cited by 215
Tang, C.-C., Tian, Y., Liang, H., Zuo, W., Wang, Z.-W., Zhang, J., & He, Z.-W. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.028 · Cited by 135
The carbohydrates of Phaeocystis and their degradation in the microbial food web
Alderkamp, A.-C., Buma, A. G. J., & van Rijssel, M. (2007) · Phaeocystis, major link in the biogeochemical cycling of climate-relevant elements · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6214-8_9 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Amon, R. M. W., & Benner, R.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-51
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2168526533
- Cited by
- 1,003
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial utilization of different size classes of dissolved organic matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0041
- The paper
- Amon, R. M. W., & Benner, R. (1996). Bacterial utilization of different size classes of dissolved organic matter. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.