The DOI matches its Crossref record.
N : P stoichiometry and ontogeny of crustacean zooplankton: A test of the growth rate hypothesis
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies have hypothesized that differences in elemental composition of zooplankton (N : P ratio) are related to differences in specific growth rate, as increased growth rate requires greater ribosomal RNA, which should result in increased %P and decreased N : P. This hypothesis was tested interspecifically using zooplankton taxa with different specific growth rates and intraspecifically using different ontogenetic stages within single species. Among all five species, growth rate was positively correlated with %N and %P and negatively correlated with N : P. However, %N increased only from ∼8% to ∼9% while %P varied fourfold across the observed range of growth rates, indicating that changes in %P drive the negative relationship between growth rate and N : P. Intraspecific comparisons showed that growth rate was positively related to %P and negatively related to N : P for Daphnia lumholtzi, but growth rate was unrelated to %P and N : P for D. magna and D. obtusa. Mean %P, %N, and N : P differed significantly among Daphnia spp. and among populations of Scapholebris mucronata and Bosmina longirostris. These data strongly support the growth rate hypothesis as an explanation for differences in body N : P in zooplankton and indicate that the biological stoichiometry of a rapid growth rate life‐history is phosphorus intensive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Denno, R. F., Dobberfuhl, D. R., Folarin, A., Huberty, A., Interlandi, S., Kilham, S. S., McCauley, E., Schulz, K. L., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35046058 · Cited by 1,645
Self-citationEffects of size and temperature on developmental time
Gillooly, J. F., Charnov, E. L., West, G. B., Savage, V. M., & Brown, J. H. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417070a · Cited by 937
The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: A review and perspectives
Sardans, J., Rivas-Ubach, A., & Peñuelas, J. (2012) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.08.002 · Cited by 685
Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: recent progress and perspectives
CROSS, W. F., BENSTEAD, J. P., FROST, P. C., & THOMAS, S. A. (2005) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01458.x · Cited by 458
Strong relationship between elemental stoichiometry and metabolome in plants
Rivas-Ubach, A., Sardans, J., Pérez-Trujillo, M., Estiarte, M., & Peñuelas, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116092109 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Main, T. M., Dobberfuhl, D. R., & Elser, J. J.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1474-1478
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2158929653
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N : P stoichiometry and ontogeny of crustacean zooplankton: A test of the growth rate hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1474
- The paper
- Main, T. M., Dobberfuhl, D. R., & Elser, J. J. (1997). N : P stoichiometry and ontogeny of crustacean zooplankton: A test of the growth rate hypothesis. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1474
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.