The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton
Abstract
Cellular carbon and nitrogen content and cell volume of nutritionally and morphologically diverse dinoflagellate species were measured to determine carbon to volume (C:vol) and nitrogen to volume (N:vol) relationships. Cellular C and N content ranged from 48 to 3.0 × 10 4 pgC cell −1 and 11 to 2,656 pgN cell −1 for cells ranging in volume from 180 to 2.8 × 10 5 µm 3 . C and N density in dinoflagellates decreased significantly with increasing cell volume. C:N ratios ranged from 3.44 to 6.45. C:vol and N:vol in dinoflagellates are significantly related as expressed by the equations pgC cell −1 = 0.760 × volume 0.819 and pgN cell −1 = 0.118 × volume 0.849 . Previously published data were combined to compare C:vol relationships in different phylogenetic protist groups, including chlorophytes, chrysophytes, prasinophytes, and prymnesiophytes. Our analysis indicated differences between the C:vol relationships available for ciliates. A new C:vol relationship for diatoms was established (pgC cell −1 = 0.288 × volume 0.811 ). Dinoflagellates are significantly more C dense than diatoms. Except for diatoms, we found few significant differences between C:vol relationships of different phylogenetic groups. Consequently, one C:vol relationship for taxonomically diverse protist plankton excluding diatoms was determined (pgC cell −1 = 0.216 × volume 0.939 ). In the combined data set, carbon density was not constant but decreased significantly with increasing cell volume. Using constant C:vol conversion factors for plankton over large size ranges will cause systematic errors in biomass estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ups and Downs in the Ocean: Effects of Biofouling on Vertical Transport of Microplastics
Kooi, M., Nes, E. H. V., Scheffer, M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04702 · Cited by 977
“32 A fi xed conversion factor for the carbon/algae cells ratio was used (mg C cell − 1 ), and for the conversion of chlorophyll-a/carbon ratio, in mg Chl a (mg C ) − 1 , we used the following temperature and light-dependent equation: 31 where nutrients are assumed to be su ffi ciently available for…”
Cell Size as a Key Determinant of Phytoplankton Metabolism and Community Structure
Marañón, E. (2015) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015955 · Cited by 514
Boyd, P. W., Rynearson, T. A., Armstrong, E. A., Fu, F., Hayashi, K., Hu, Z., Hutchins, D. A., Kudela, R. M., Litchman, E., Mulholland, M. R., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063091 · Cited by 429
Warming and eutrophication combine to restructure diatoms and dinoflagellates
Xiao, W., Liu, X., Irwin, A. J., Laws, E. A., Wang, L., Chen, B., Zeng, Y., & Huang, B. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.051 · Cited by 359
Fatty Acid Profiles and Production in Marine Phytoplankton
Jónasdóttir, S. H. (2019) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md17030151 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Menden-Deuer, S., & Lessard, E. J.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04-26
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 569-579
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2143182887
- Cited by
- 2,407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0569
- The paper
- Menden-Deuer, S., & Lessard, E. J. (2000). Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.