The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Persistence of net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food web manipulations
Open accessAbstract
Net ecosystem production (NEP) is the difference between gross primary production (GPP) and community respiration (R). We estimated in situ NEP using three independent approaches (net CO 2 gas flux, net O 2 gas flux, and continuous diel O 2 measurements) over a 4–7 yr period in a series of small lakes in which food webs were manipulated and nutrient loadings were experimentally varied. In the absence of manipulation, these lakes were net heterotrophic according to all three approaches. NEP (NEP = GPP‐R) was consistently negative and averaged −35.5 ± 3.7 (standard error) mmol C m−2 d−1. Nutrient enrichment, in the absence of strong planktivory, tended to cause increases in estimates of both GPP and R (estimated from the continuous O 2 data) but resulted in little change in the GPP/R ratio, which remained <1, or NEP, which remained negative. When planktivorous fish dominated the food web, large zooplankton were rare and nutrient enrichment produced positive values of NEP by all three methods. Among lakes and years, daily values of NEP ranged from −241 to +175 mmol m−2 d−1; mean seasonal NEP was positive only under a combination of high nutrient loading and a planktivore‐dominated food web. Community R is significantly subsidized by allochthonous sources of organic matter in these lakes. Combining all lakes and years, we estimate that ~26 mmol C m−2 d−1 of allochthonous origin is respired on average. This respiration of allochthonous organic matter represents 13 to 43% of total R, and this fraction declines with increasing GPP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity
Moore, J. C., Berlow, E. L., Coleman, D. C., de Ruiter, P. C., Dong, Q., Hastings, A., Johnson, N. C., McCann, K. S., Melville, K., Morin, P. J., et al. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00606.x · Cited by 1,251
Current knowledge on non‐native freshwater fish introductions
Gozlan, R. E., Britton, J. R., Cowx, I., & Copp, G. H. (2010) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02566.x · Cited by 852
Marcarelli, A. M., Baxter, C. V., Mineau, M. M., & Hall, R. O. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-2240.1 · Cited by 490
Jeppesen, E., Nõges, P., Davidson, T. A., Haberman, J., Nõges, T., Blank, K., Lauridsen, T. L., Søndergaard, M., Sayer, C., Laugaste, R., et al. (2011) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0831-0 · Cited by 451
Carpenter, S. R., Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Van de Bogert, M., Bade, D. L., Bastviken, D., Gille, C. M., Hodgson, J. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Kritzberg, E. S. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-1282 · Cited by 391
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1718-1730
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2145654062
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persistence of net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food web manipulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2000.45.8.1718
- The paper
- Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F. (2000). Persistence of net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food web manipulations. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.8.1718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.