The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity
Abstract
We studied the fluorescence properties of fulvic acids isolated from streams and rivers receiving predominantly terrestrial sources of organic material and from lakes with microbial sources of organic material. Microbially derived fulvic acids have fluorophores with a more sharply defined emission peak occurring at lower wavelengths than fluorophores in terrestrially derived fulvic acids. We show that the ratio of the emission intensity at a wavelength of 450 nm to that at 500 nm, obtained with an excitation of 370 nm, can serve as a simple index to distinguish sources of isolated aquatic fulvic acids. In our study, this index has a value of ~1.9 for microbially derived fulvic acids and a value of ~1.4 for terrestrially derived fulvic acids. Fulvic acids isolated from four large rivers in the United States have fluorescence index values of 1.4–1.5, consistent with predominantly terrestrial sources. For fulvic acid samples isolated from a river, lakes, and groundwaters in a forested watershed, the fluorescence index varied in a manner suggesting different sources for the seepage and streamfed lakes. Furthermore, we identified these distinctive fluorophores in filtered whole water samples from lakes in a desert oasis in Antarctica and in filtered whole water samples collected during snowmelt from a Rocky Mountain stream. The fluorescence index measurement in filtered whole water samples in field studies may augment the interpretation of dissolved organic carbon sources for understanding carbon cycling in aquatic ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKnight, D. M., Bencala, K. E., Zellweger, G. W., Aiken, G. R., Feder, G. L., & Thorn, K. A. (1992) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00031a017 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Cited by
Shutova, Y., Baker, A., Bridgeman, J., & Henderson, R. K. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.053 · Cited by 438
Minor, E. C., Swenson, M. M., Mattson, B. M., & Oyler, A. R. (2014) · Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts · doi:10.1039/c4em00062e · Cited by 305
Lavonen, E. E., Kothawala, D. N., Tranvik, L. J., Gonsior, M., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., & Köhler, S. J. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.024 · Cited by 274
Wickland, K. P., Aiken, G. R., Butler, K., Dornblaser, M. M., Spencer, R. G. M., & Striegl, R. G. (2012) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2012gb004342 · Cited by 272
Mladenov, N., Zheng, Y., Miller, M. P., Nemergut, D. R., Legg, T., Simone, B., Hageman, C., Rahman, M. M., Ahmed, K. M., & McKnight, D. M. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901472g · Cited by 243
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McKnight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P. K., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T., & Andersen, D. T.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-48
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2120321951
- Cited by
- 3,112
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038
- The paper
- McKnight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P. K., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T., & Andersen, D. T. (2001). Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.