The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bioavailability of DON from natural and anthropogenic sources to estuarine plankton
Abstract
Utilization of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) from natural (forests) and anthropogenic (animal pastures, urban/suburban storm water runoff) sources (three sites per source) by estuarine plankton communities was examined in spring, summer, and fall. The proportion of DON utilized ranged from 0 to 73%. Overall, urban/suburban storm water runoff had a higher proportion of bioavailable DON (59% ± 11) compared to agricultural pastures (30% 14) and forests (23% ± 19). DON bioavailability varied seasonally; however, the seasonal pattern differed for the three sources. Bacterial production increased linearly with the amount of DON utilized across all sources and seasons; the rate of increase was approximately five times greater per micromole of N as DON used relative to dissolved inorganic N (DIN) used. Although phytoplankton production generally increased with DON addition, the increased production was not correlated with the amount of DON utilized, suggesting that a variable portion of dissolved organic matter (DOM)‐N was directly or indirectly available to the phytoplankton. This indicates that phytoplankton production is not a good measure of the amount of bioavailable DON, and measurements of the amount of bioavailable DON based on bacterial responses alone might not reflect N available to phytoplankton. Preliminary seasonal budgets of bioavailable N (DIN plus bioavailable DON) as a function of land use suggest that ~80% of the total dissolved N (TDN) from urban/suburban runoff is bioavailable, whereas a lower proportion (20–60%) of TDN is bioavailable from forests and pastures. N budgets for aquatic ecosystems based on only DIN loading underestimate bioavailable N loading, whereas total N or TDN budgets overestimate bioavailable N inputs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus
Heisler, J., Glibert, P. M., Burkholder, J. M., Anderson, D. M., Cochlan, W., Dennison, W. C., Dortch, Q., Gobler, C. J., Heil, C. A., Humphries, E., et al. (2008) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.006 · Cited by 2,090
Global river nutrient export: A scenario analysis of past and future trends
Seitzinger, S. P., Mayorga, E., Bouwman, A. F., Kroeze, C., Beusen, A. H. W., Billen, G., Van Drecht, G., Dumont, E., Fekete, B. M., Garnier, J., et al. (2010) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2009gb003587 · Cited by 894
Self-citationMixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters
Burkholder, J. M., Glibert, P. M., & Skelton, H. M. (2008) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.010 · Cited by 590
Lewis, W. M., Wurtsbaugh, W. A., & Paerl, H. W. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202401p · Cited by 554
Lang, M., Li, P., & Yan, X. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.044 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Seitzinger, S. P., Sanders, R. W., & Styles, R.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 353-366
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2159382368
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioavailability of DON from natural and anthropogenic sources to estuarine plankton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2002.47.2.0353
- The paper
- Seitzinger, S. P., Sanders, R. W., & Styles, R. (2002). Bioavailability of DON from natural and anthropogenic sources to estuarine plankton. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.2.0353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.