Cited by 125Marine and fisheries researchOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Routes and rates of larval fish transport from the southeast to the northeast United States continental shelf

Open access
Hare, Jonathan A., Churchill, James H., Cowen, Robert K., Berger, Thomas J., Cornillon, Peter C., Dragos, Paul, Glenn, Scott M., Govoni, John J. +1 more·2002·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

Larval fish originating south of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, are frequently found on the continental shelf north of Cape Hatteras, even as far north as the Scotian shelf. The Gulf Stream and associated warm‐core rings are hypothesized as the physical mechanisms responsible for the northward transport of larvae. Specifically, larvae spawned along the southeast U.S. continental shelf are entrained into the Gulf Stream, transported to the northeast, regularly incorporated in warm‐core ring streamers, transported across the slope region, and released along the shelf edge north of Cape Hatteras. This proposed transport route was evaluated using hydrographic data and drifter tracks that were collected as part of other studies. Continental shelf water that originated south of Cape Hatteras was found along the edge of the Gulf Stream north of Cape Hatteras, and drifter tracks demonstrated each segment of the proposed transport route. A probability model was then developed to estimate transport times for larvae carried over the proposed transport route using a combination of sea surface temperature images, statistics of drifter transport speeds, and a larval mortality function. Modeled transport time distributions closely matched observed age distributions of larvae, further supporting the hypothesized transport route.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.2002.47.6.1774

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hare, J. A., Churchill, J. H., Cowen, R. K., Berger, T. J., Cornillon, P. C., Dragos, P., Glenn, S. M., Govoni, J. J., & Lee, T. N.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • Battelle (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1774-1789
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2105237378
Cited by
125
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Limnology and Oceanography (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
larval dispersal, Gulf Stream, warm-core rings, continental shelf, Cape Hatteras, larval mortality, sea surface temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review