The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic and structural response of hyporheic microbial communities to variations in supply of dissolved organic matter
Open accessAbstract
Hyporheic sediment bacterial communities were exposed to dissolved organic matter (DOM) from a variety of sources to assess the interdependence of bacterial metabolism and community composition. Experiments ranged from small‐scale core perfusions with defined compounds (glucose, bovine serum albumin) to mesocosms receiving natural leaf leachate or water from different streams. Response variables included bacterial production, oxygen consumption, extracellular enzyme activity, and community similarity as manifest by changes in banding patterns of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). All DOM manipulations generated responses in at least one metabolic variable. Additions of both labile and recalcitrant materials increased either oxygen consumption, production, or both depending on background DOM. Enzyme activities were affected by both types of carbon addition with largest effects from the labile mixture. Cluster analysis of RAPD data showed strong divergence of communities exposed to labile versus recalcitrant DOM. Additions of leaf leachate to mesocosms representing hyporheic flowpaths caused increases in oxygen consumption and some enzyme activities with weaker effects on production. Community structure was strongly affected; samples from the leachate‐amended mesocosms clustered separately from the control samples. In mesocosms receiving water from streams ranging in DOC (0.5–4.5 mg L−1), there were significant differences in bacterial growth, oxygen consumption, and enzyme activities. RAPD analysis showed strongest clustering of samples by stream type with more subtle effects of position along the flowpaths. Responses in community metabolism were always accompanied by shifts in community composition, suggesting carbon supply affects both functional and structural attributes of hyporheic bacterial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Producer–decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects
Naeem, S., Hahn, D. R., & Schuurman, G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001568 · Cited by 261
Cited by
The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms
Battin, T. J., Besemer, K., Bengtsson, M. M., Romani, A. M., & Packmann, A. I. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.15 · Cited by 1,163
Singh, D. V., Bhat, R. A., Upadhyay, A. K., Singh, R., & Singh, D. (2021) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2020.101340 · Cited by 128
Betts, E. F., & Jones, J. B. (2009) · Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research · doi:10.1657/1938-4246-41.4.407 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Findlay, S. E. G., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Sobczak, W. V., & Hoostal, M.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1608-1617
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2143684829
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic and structural response of hyporheic microbial communities to variations in supply of dissolved organic matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1608
- The paper
- Findlay, S. E. G., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Sobczak, W. V., & Hoostal, M. (2003). Metabolic and structural response of hyporheic microbial communities to variations in supply of dissolved organic matter. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.