The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Low symbiont diversity in southern Great Barrier Reef corals, relative to those of the Caribbean
Abstract
The specific identity of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium spp.) from most zooxanthellate corals is unknown. In a survey of symbiotic cnidarians from the southern Great Barrier Reef (GBR), 23 symbiont types were identified from 86 host species representing 40 genera. A majority (>85%) of these symbionts belong to a single phylogenetic clade or subgenus ("C") composed of closely related (as assessed by sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer region and the ribosomal large subunit gene), yet ecologically and physiologically distinct, types. A few prevalent symbiont types, or generalists, dominate the coral community of the southern GBR, whereas many rare and/or specific symbionts, or specialists, are found uniquely within certain host taxa. The comparison of symbiont diversity between southern GBR and Caribbean reefs shows an inverse relationship between coral diversity and symbiont diversity, perhaps as a consequence of more‐rapid diversification of Caribbean symbionts. Among clade C types, generalists C1 and C3 are common to both Caribbean and southern GBR symbiont assemblages, whereas the rest are regionally endemic. Possibly because of environmental changes in the Caribbean after geographic isolation through the Quaternary period, a high proportion of Caribbean fauna associate with symbiont taxa from two other distantly related Symbiodinium clades (A and B) that rarely occur in Pacific hosts. The resilience of Porites spp. and the resistance of Montipora digitata to thermal stress and bleaching are partially explained by their association with a thermally tolerant symbiont type, whereas the indiscriminant widespread bleaching and death among certain Pacific corals, during El Niño Southern Oscillation events, are influenced by associations with symbionts possessing higher sensitivity to thermal stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution
Rosenberg, E., Koren, O., Reshef, L., Efrony, R., & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1635 · Cited by 1,502
Metabolic interactions between algal symbionts and invertebrate hosts
YELLOWLEES, D., REES, T. A. V., & LEGGAT, W. (2008) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01802.x · Cited by 608
Coral bleaching: the role of the host
Baird, A. H., Bhagooli, R., Ralph, P. J., & Takahashi, S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.005 · Cited by 585
Iglesias-Prieto, R., Beltrán, V. H., LaJeunesse, T. C., Reyes-Bonilla, H., & Thomé, P. E. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2757 · Cited by 440
Self-citationSTAT, M., CARTER, D., & HOEGHGULDBERG, O. (2006) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2006.04.001 · Cited by 366
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LaJeunesse, T. C., Loh, W. K. W., van Woesik, R., Hoegh‐Guldberg, O., Schmidt, G. W., & Fitt, W. K.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2046-2054
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2164274090
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low symbiont diversity in southern Great Barrier Reef corals, relative to those of the Caribbean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.2046
- The paper
- LaJeunesse, T. C., Loh, W. K. W., van Woesik, R., Hoegh‐Guldberg, O., Schmidt, G. W., & Fitt, W. K. (2003). Low symbiont diversity in southern Great Barrier Reef corals, relative to those of the Caribbean. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.2046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.