The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative detection of chlorophyll in cyanobacterial blooms by satellite remote sensing
Open accessAbstract
The extent of cyanobacterial blooms has been mapped using different satellite sensors from weather satellites to synthetic aperture radars. Quantitative detection of chlorophyll in cyanobacterial blooms by remote sensing, however, has been less successful. The first civilian hyperspectral sensor in space, Hyperion, acquired an image of cyanobacterial bloom in the western part of the Gulf of Finland on 14 July 2002. A chlorophyll concentration map was produced from this image using a spectral library that was created by running a bio‐optical model with variable concentrations of chlorophyll. The results show that chlorophyll concentrations in the bloom area were much higher than reported by conventional water‐monitoring programs, ships‐of‐opportunity, and satellite measurements. The reason why both in situ and satellite methods underestimate the amount of phytoplankton during cyanobacterial blooms is vertical and horizontal distribution of cyanobacteria, because cyanobacteria can regulate their buoyancy and are not uniformly distributed within the top mixed layer of water column in calm weather conditions. Aggregations of cyanobacteria form dense subsurface blooms and surface scums during extensive blooms. This study demonstrates that it is difficult to collect representative water samples from research vessels using standard methods because ships and water samplers destroy the natural distribution of cyanobacteria in the sampling process. Flowthrough systems take water samples from the depths at which the concentration of cyanobacteria is not correlated with the amount of phytoplankton that remote sensing instruments detect. The chlorophyll estimation accuracy in cyanobacterial blooms by many satellites is limited because of spatial resolution, as significant changes in chlorophyll concentration occur even at a smaller spatial scale than 30 m.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sensor Capability and Atmospheric Correction in Ocean Colour Remote Sensing
Emberton, S., Chittka, L., Cavallaro, A., & Wang, M. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs8010001 · Cited by 486
Hu, C., Lee, Z., Ma, R., Yu, K., Li, D., & Shang, S. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2009jc005511 · Cited by 431
Wynne, T. T., Stumpf, R. P., Tomlinson, M. C., & Dyble, J. (2010) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.2025 · Cited by 307
Monitoring cyanobacterial blooms by satellite remote sensing
Kutser, T., Metsamaa, L., Strömbeck, N., & Vahtmäe, E. (2006) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.024 · Cited by 295
Self-citationApplication of Remote Sensing in Water Resource Management: The Case Study of Lake Trasimeno, Italy
Giardino, C., Bresciani, M., Villa, P., & Martinelli, A. (2010) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9639-3 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Kutser, T.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2179-2189
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2086302379
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative detection of chlorophyll in cyanobacterial blooms by satellite remote sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2004.49.6.2179
- The paper
- Kutser, T. (2004). Quantitative detection of chlorophyll in cyanobacterial blooms by satellite remote sensing. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.6.2179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.